Comparison of equipment management and cleaning protocols for rigid sigmoidoscopy

被引:2
|
作者
Simpson, Paul J. B. [1 ]
McMurrick, Paul J. [1 ]
Polglase, Adrian L. [1 ]
Koh, Cherry E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Sigmoidoscopy; Proctoscopy; Sterilisation; Enzymatic cleaning; Insufflation bellows; Cleaning protocol;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05279.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To provide outcome data relating to cleaning of rigid sigmoidoscopy equipment comparing commonly used techniques, allowing a framework for general guidelines for use in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 104 rigid sigmoidoscopies were performed in the rooms of two colorectal surgeons using standard techniques. A three-way randomization was performed adopting the following variables: enzymatic washing versus steam sterilization of the light head, disposable versus reusable bellows and use with versus without an air filter. Aerosol from each system was collected on agar plates, and review of colony count numbers was performed. Results: Gross faecal contamination of the rigid sigmoidoscope light head did not occur during any of the procedures. One plate grew a single-gram negative colony; all other contaminated plates showed environmental flora only. Reusable bellows in combination with an air filter showed lower mean colony counts (environmental flora) from the pre-procedure cultures as well as from the bellows' cultures. Conclusion: Enteric flora in this study was rarely aerosolized, and the use of an air filter may decrease this likelihood even further. There is no advantage in using disposable insufflation bellows when compared with the reusable type, allowing considerable cost saving. Washing the light head between procedures with enzymatic solution is a safe cheap and effective method of decontamination.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 731
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized comparison of protocols of equipment management and cleaning for rigid sigmoidscopy
    McMurrick, P.
    Polglase, A.
    Simpson, P.
    Staples, M.
    Koh, C.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 797 - 798
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF RIGID AND FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY
    GARDNER, RC
    SWENY, SE
    KANTROWITZ, PA
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1980, 26 (02) : 67 - 67
  • [3] A Comparison of Outpatient Rigid Sigmoidoscopy Versus Flexible Sigmoidoscopy; Does Outpatient Rigid Sigmoidoscopy Still Have a Role?
    Gonsalves, S.
    Anwar, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 136 - 136
  • [4] FIBEROPTIC PANSIGMOIDOSCOPY - EVALUATION AND COMPARISON WITH RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY
    BOHLMAN, TW
    KATON, RM
    LIPSHUTZ, GR
    MCCOOL, MF
    SMITH, FW
    MELNYK, CS
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1977, 72 (04) : 644 - 649
  • [5] A comparison of rigid sigmoidoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for surveillance of rectal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis
    Beveridge, IG
    Swain, DJW
    Wilkinson, KH
    Saunders, BP
    Phillips, RKS
    GUT, 1999, 44 : A142 - A142
  • [6] COMPARISON OF THE COST FOR FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY AND RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY IN PRE-BARIUM ENEMA SCREENING
    SHIAU, YF
    KHOURI, MR
    ATKINS, R
    ROSEMAN, S
    MCCOLLAUM, P
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (02) : 194 - 195
  • [7] A comparison of rigid sigmoidoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for surveillance of rectal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis
    Beveridge, IG
    Swain, DJW
    Wilkinson, KH
    Saunders, BP
    Phillips, RKS
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (04) : AB61 - AB61
  • [8] WHY FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY INSTEAD OF RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY
    RODNEY, WM
    FELMAR, E
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1984, 19 (04): : 471 - 476
  • [9] IS RIGID SIGMOIDOSCOPY OBSOLETE
    BUCHMANN, P
    BRUGGER, JJ
    CHIRURG, 1985, 56 (06): : 403 - 407
  • [10] SIGMOIDOSCOPY - RIGID OR FLEXIBLE
    COHEN, ME
    BARKIN, JS
    GOLDBERG, RI
    PHILLIPS, RS
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 258 (23): : 3388 - 3388