Impact of auxin herbicides on Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) groundcover

被引:4
|
作者
Priess, Grant L. [1 ]
Norsworthy, Jason K. [1 ]
Farr, Rodger B. [1 ]
Mauromoustakos, Andy [2 ]
Butts, Thomas R. [1 ]
Roberts, Trenton L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Syst, Div Agr, Fayetteville, AR USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Agr Stat Lab, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Syst, Soil Fertil Soil Testing, Div Agr, Fayetteville, AR USA
关键词
Application equipment; digital imagery analysis; field crops; herbicide interaction; leaf area; symptomology; SOYBEAN GLYCINE-MAX; DROPLET SIZE; SPRAY VOLUME; EFFICACY; DICAMBA; 2,4-D; GLYPHOSATE; NOZZLE; PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTION;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2021.74
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In current and next-generation weed control technologies, sequential applications of contact and systemic herbicides for postemergence control of troublesome weeds are needed to mitigate the evolution of herbicide resistance. A clear understanding of the impact auxin herbicide symptomology has on Palmer amaranth groundcover will aid optimization of sequential herbicide applications. Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted in Fayetteville, AR, and a laboratory experiment was conducted in Lonoke, AR, in 2020 to evaluate changes in Palmer amaranth groundcover following an application of 2,4-D and dicamba with various nozzles, droplet sizes, and velocities. Field experiments utilized three nozzles: Extended Range (XR), Air Induction Extended Range (AIXR), and Turbo TeeJet (R) Induction (TTI), to assess the effect of spray droplet size on changes in Palmer amaranth groundcover. Nozzle did not affect Palmer amaranth groundcover when dicamba was applied. However, nozzle selection did impact groundcover when 2,4-D was applied; the following nozzle order XR > AIXR > TTI reduced Palmer amaranth groundcover the most in both site-years of the field experiment. This result (XR > AIXR > TTI) matches percent spray coverage data for 2,4-D and is inversely related to spray droplet size data. Rapid reductions of Palmer amaranth groundcover from 100% at time zero to 39.4% to 64.1% and 60.0% to 85.8% were observed 180 min after application in greenhouse and field experiments, respectively, regardless of herbicide or nozzle. In one site-year of the greenhouse and field experiments, regrowth of Palmer amaranth occurred 10,080 min (14 d) after an application of either 2,4-D or dicamba to larger than labeled weeds. In all experiments, complete reduction of live Palmer amaranth tissue was not observed 21 d after application with any herbicide or nozzle combination. Control of Palmer amaranth escapes with reduced groundcover may potentially lead to increased selection pressure on sequentially applied herbicides due to a reduction in spray solution contact with the targeted pest.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 778
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Coevolution of resistance to PPO inhibitors in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
    Lillie, Kathryn J.
    Giacomini, Darci A.
    Green, Jonathan D.
    Tranel, Patrick J.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2019, 67 (05) : 521 - 526
  • [32] Demographics of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in annual and perennial cover crops
    Weisberger, David A.
    Leon, Ramon G.
    Gruner, Chandler E.
    Levi, Matthew
    Gaur, Nandita
    Morgan, Gaylon
    Basinger, Nicholas T.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2024, 72 (01) : 96 - 107
  • [33] Response of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate, fomesafen, and pyrithiobac
    Bond, Jason A.
    Oliver, Lawrence R.
    Stephenson, Daniel O.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (04) : 885 - 892
  • [34] INFLUENCE OF PLANTING DATE ON GROWTH OF PALMER AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS-PALMERI)
    KEELEY, PE
    CARTER, CH
    THULLEN, RJ
    WEED SCIENCE, 1987, 35 (02) : 199 - 204
  • [35] Interference of Selected Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Biotypes in Soybean (Glycinemax)
    Chandi, Aman
    Jordan, David L.
    York, Alan C.
    Milla-Lewis, Susana R.
    Burton, James D.
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    Whitaker, Jared R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2012, 2012
  • [36] Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    Grey, Timothy L.
    Vencill, William K.
    Kichler, Jeremy M.
    Webster, Theodore M.
    Brown, Steve M.
    York, Alan C.
    Davis, Jerry W.
    Hanna, Wayne W.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2006, 54 (04) : 620 - 626
  • [37] Integrating Cover Crops and POST Herbicides for Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Corn
    Wiggins, Matthew S.
    McClure, M. Angela
    Hayes, Robert M.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 412 - 418
  • [38] Investigating sexual and asexual modes of reproduction in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
    Brackenridge, Hayley L.
    Konstantinov, Nikita
    Han, Lisa H.
    Yakimowski, Sarah B.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2024, 72 (04) : 375 - 386
  • [39] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Control with Very-Long-Chain Fatty Acid Inhibiting Herbicides
    Hay, Marshall M.
    Shoup, Douglas E.
    Peterson, Dallas E.
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 4 (01)
  • [40] ALLELOPATHIC EFFECTS OF PALMER AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS-PALMERI) ON SEEDLING GROWTH
    MENGES, RM
    WEED SCIENCE, 1988, 36 (03) : 325 - 328