Impact of auxin herbicides on Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) groundcover

被引:4
|
作者
Priess, Grant L. [1 ]
Norsworthy, Jason K. [1 ]
Farr, Rodger B. [1 ]
Mauromoustakos, Andy [2 ]
Butts, Thomas R. [1 ]
Roberts, Trenton L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Syst, Div Agr, Fayetteville, AR USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Agr Stat Lab, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Syst, Soil Fertil Soil Testing, Div Agr, Fayetteville, AR USA
关键词
Application equipment; digital imagery analysis; field crops; herbicide interaction; leaf area; symptomology; SOYBEAN GLYCINE-MAX; DROPLET SIZE; SPRAY VOLUME; EFFICACY; DICAMBA; 2,4-D; GLYPHOSATE; NOZZLE; PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTION;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2021.74
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In current and next-generation weed control technologies, sequential applications of contact and systemic herbicides for postemergence control of troublesome weeds are needed to mitigate the evolution of herbicide resistance. A clear understanding of the impact auxin herbicide symptomology has on Palmer amaranth groundcover will aid optimization of sequential herbicide applications. Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted in Fayetteville, AR, and a laboratory experiment was conducted in Lonoke, AR, in 2020 to evaluate changes in Palmer amaranth groundcover following an application of 2,4-D and dicamba with various nozzles, droplet sizes, and velocities. Field experiments utilized three nozzles: Extended Range (XR), Air Induction Extended Range (AIXR), and Turbo TeeJet (R) Induction (TTI), to assess the effect of spray droplet size on changes in Palmer amaranth groundcover. Nozzle did not affect Palmer amaranth groundcover when dicamba was applied. However, nozzle selection did impact groundcover when 2,4-D was applied; the following nozzle order XR > AIXR > TTI reduced Palmer amaranth groundcover the most in both site-years of the field experiment. This result (XR > AIXR > TTI) matches percent spray coverage data for 2,4-D and is inversely related to spray droplet size data. Rapid reductions of Palmer amaranth groundcover from 100% at time zero to 39.4% to 64.1% and 60.0% to 85.8% were observed 180 min after application in greenhouse and field experiments, respectively, regardless of herbicide or nozzle. In one site-year of the greenhouse and field experiments, regrowth of Palmer amaranth occurred 10,080 min (14 d) after an application of either 2,4-D or dicamba to larger than labeled weeds. In all experiments, complete reduction of live Palmer amaranth tissue was not observed 21 d after application with any herbicide or nozzle combination. Control of Palmer amaranth escapes with reduced groundcover may potentially lead to increased selection pressure on sequentially applied herbicides due to a reduction in spray solution contact with the targeted pest.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 778
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cover Crops Suppression of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Cotton
    Palhano, Matheus G.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Barber, Tom
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [22] Timeline of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) invasion and eradication in Minnesota
    Yu, Eric
    Blair, Shane
    Hardel, Mari
    Chandler, Monika
    Thiede, Denise
    Cortilet, Anthony
    Gunsolus, Jeffrey
    Becker, Roger
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (05) : 802 - 810
  • [23] Critical timing of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) removal in sweetpotato
    Smith, Stephen C.
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Monks, David W.
    Chaudhari, Sushila
    Schultheis, Jonathan R.
    Reberg-Horton, Chris
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 547 - 551
  • [24] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Management in GlyTol® LibertyLink® Cotton
    Reed, Jacob D.
    Keeling, J. Wayne
    Dotray, Peter A.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) : 592 - 600
  • [25] Susceptibility of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to herbicides in accessions collected from the North Carolina Coastal Plain
    Mahoney, Denis J.
    Jordan, David L.
    Roma-Burgos, Nilda
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Leon, Ramon G.
    Vann, Matthew C.
    Everman, Wesley J.
    Cahoon, Charles W.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2020, 68 (06) : 582 - 593
  • [26] Competitive impact of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield
    Morgan, GD
    Baumann, PA
    Chandler, JM
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (03) : 408 - 412
  • [27] Evaluating Cover Crops and Herbicides for Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Cotton
    Wiggins, Matthew S.
    Hayes, Robert M.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (02) : 415 - 422
  • [28] Sex-specific markers for waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
    Montgomery, Jacob S.
    Sadeque, Ahmed
    Giacomini, Darci A.
    Brown, Patrick J.
    Tranel, Patrick J.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2019, 67 (04) : 412 - 418
  • [29] Critical Period for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Pickling Cucumber
    McGowen, Samuel J.
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Chaudhari, Sushila
    Monks, David W.
    Schultheis, Jonathan R.
    Reberg-Horton, Chris
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) : 586 - 591
  • [30] A nonnative Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) population in the Republic of South Africa is resistant to herbicides with different sites of action
    Reinhardt, Carl
    Vorster, Juan
    Kupper, Anita
    Peter, Falco
    Simelane, Adelaide
    Friis, Stephanus
    Magson, Jacques
    Aradhya, Chandrashekar
    WEED SCIENCE, 2022, 70 (02) : 183 - 197