Molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Farshid, Gelareh [1 ,2 ]
Walters, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hosp, SA Pathol, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Med, SA Pathol, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Dept Surg, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2; Screening; Mammography; Molecular classification; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; HER2; AMPLIFICATION; PRIMARY THERAPY; SURVIVAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-018-4899-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundDetection of breast cancers by mammographic screening confers a survival advantage of 20-50% compared to symptomatic presentations. The improved prognosis is only partly explained by stage migration. The distribution of the molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer (SDBC) or their HER2 status has not been studied extensively. We wished to address these issues through the study of a large series of SDBC, with other presentations serving as controls.DesignDeidentified cases of female invasive cancer, diagnosed in Australia and New Zealand during 2005-2015, were retrieved from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA). Method of detection and selected patient, tumour and treatment data were assessed. Immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular subtypes were defined as Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), Luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-enriched (ER-, PR- and HER2+) and basal-like (triple negative). Results were compared with the findings of controls and previous studies.Result100983 invasive cancers were diagnosed, including 32493 (32.7%) SDBC and 66907 (67.3%) with other presentations. The biomarker profile for SDBC versus other presentations in the same population was ER 89.3 versus 80.3%, PR 78.8 versus 69.8% and for HER2 11 versus 15.6%. The distribution of molecular subtypes was Luminal A 81.9 versus 70.74%, Luminal B 7.39 versus 9.52%, HER2-enriched 3.63 versus 6.06% and Basal-like 7.08 versus 13.68%. These differences were significant (p<0.0001).ConclusionMolecular profiles of SDBC are significantly different from those of symptomatic cancers, with over-representation of the Luminal A and proportionately lower rates of all other subtypes. We have shown, for the first time, significantly lower rates of HER2 positivity in SDBC. These differences may contribute to the better survival of SDBC and have implications for prognostication, targeted therapy decisions and for laboratory quality assurance programs in setting target ranges for proportions of ER-positive and HER2 results in heavily screened populations.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Should screen-detected breast cancers be managed differently?
    Krzyzanowska, MK
    Tannock, IF
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (16): : 1170 - 1171
  • [42] Surgical intervention in screen-detected patients versus symptomatic patients with breast cancer
    Dillon, MF
    Hill, ADK
    Quinn, CM
    O'Doherty, A
    Crown, J
    Fleming, FJ
    McDermott, EW
    O'Higgins, N
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2004, 11 (03) : 130 - 134
  • [43] Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Local Staging of Screen-Detected Breast Cancer
    MacCallum, Caroline
    Elder, Kenneth
    Nickson, Carolyn
    Ruecker, Kelly
    Park, Allan
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Rose, Allison K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (10) : 6820 - 6830
  • [44] Estimating The Prevalence Of Screen-Detected Lung Cancer
    O'Toole, J.
    Bates, J. H. T.
    Stapleton, R. D.
    Kinsey, C. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [45] Risk Factors and Mortality Among Women With Interval Breast Cancer vs Screen-Detected Breast Cancer
    Song, Huiyeon
    Tran, Thi Xuan Mai
    Kim, Soyeoun
    Park, Boyoung
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E2411927
  • [46] Integrative cross-platform characterisation of mammographic screen-detected breast cancer
    Cheung, Alison M.
    Wang, Dan
    Liu, Kela
    Amemiya, Yutaka
    Slodkowska, Elzbieta
    Mainprize, James G.
    Bayani, Jane
    Seth, Arun
    Bartlett, John
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [47] Determinants of anemia in screen-detected colorectal cancer
    Mansouri, David
    McMillan, Donald
    Crighton, Emilia M.
    Horgan, Paul G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (03)
  • [48] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Tupper, Carl A.
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Astley, Susan
    Bydder, Megan
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Harkness, Elaine
    Lim, Yit Y.
    Wilson, Mary
    Morris, Julie
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
  • [49] Prognosis of small screen-detected invasive breast cancers
    Ellis, I.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (Suppl 3)
  • [50] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Carl A Tupper
    Anthony J Maxwell
    Susan Astley
    Megan Bydder
    Soujanya Gadde
    Elaine Harkness
    Yit Y Lim
    Mary Wilson
    Julie Morris
    Breast Cancer Research, 17