Molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Farshid, Gelareh [1 ,2 ]
Walters, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hosp, SA Pathol, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Med, SA Pathol, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Dept Surg, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2; Screening; Mammography; Molecular classification; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; HER2; AMPLIFICATION; PRIMARY THERAPY; SURVIVAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-018-4899-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundDetection of breast cancers by mammographic screening confers a survival advantage of 20-50% compared to symptomatic presentations. The improved prognosis is only partly explained by stage migration. The distribution of the molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer (SDBC) or their HER2 status has not been studied extensively. We wished to address these issues through the study of a large series of SDBC, with other presentations serving as controls.DesignDeidentified cases of female invasive cancer, diagnosed in Australia and New Zealand during 2005-2015, were retrieved from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA). Method of detection and selected patient, tumour and treatment data were assessed. Immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular subtypes were defined as Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-), Luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-enriched (ER-, PR- and HER2+) and basal-like (triple negative). Results were compared with the findings of controls and previous studies.Result100983 invasive cancers were diagnosed, including 32493 (32.7%) SDBC and 66907 (67.3%) with other presentations. The biomarker profile for SDBC versus other presentations in the same population was ER 89.3 versus 80.3%, PR 78.8 versus 69.8% and for HER2 11 versus 15.6%. The distribution of molecular subtypes was Luminal A 81.9 versus 70.74%, Luminal B 7.39 versus 9.52%, HER2-enriched 3.63 versus 6.06% and Basal-like 7.08 versus 13.68%. These differences were significant (p<0.0001).ConclusionMolecular profiles of SDBC are significantly different from those of symptomatic cancers, with over-representation of the Luminal A and proportionately lower rates of all other subtypes. We have shown, for the first time, significantly lower rates of HER2 positivity in SDBC. These differences may contribute to the better survival of SDBC and have implications for prognostication, targeted therapy decisions and for laboratory quality assurance programs in setting target ranges for proportions of ER-positive and HER2 results in heavily screened populations.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CONTRAST ENHANCED MAMMOGRAPHY IN FURTHER ASSESSMENT OF SCREEN-DETECTED BREAST CANCER
    MacCallum, Caroline
    Elder, Kenneth
    Nickson, Carolyn
    Ruecker, Kelly
    Park, Allan
    Rose, Allison
    Mann, Gregory Bruce
    BREAST, 2023, 68 : 236 - 236
  • [32] Margins and outcome of screen-detected breast cancer with extensive in situ component
    Kitchen, PRB
    Cawson, JN
    Moore, SE
    Hill, PA
    Barbetti, TM
    Wilkins, PA
    Power, AM
    Henderson, MA
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 76 (07) : 591 - 595
  • [33] Contrast enhanced mammography in further assessment of screen-detected breast cancer
    Maccallum, C.
    Mann, G. B.
    Rose, A.
    Nickson, C.
    Ruecker, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 175 : S33 - S34
  • [34] Comparison of characteristics between asymptomatic/screen-detected breast cancer versus symptomatic breast cancer
    Lee, Young-jin
    Kim, Jisun
    Yoo, Tae-Kyung
    Lee, Sae Byul
    Chung, Il Yong
    Ko, Beom Seok
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Lee, Jong Won
    Son, Byung Ho
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : S110 - S110
  • [35] Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival
    Dawson, S. J.
    Duffy, S. W.
    Blows, F. M.
    Driver, K. E.
    Provenzano, E.
    LeQuesne, J.
    Greenberg, D. C.
    Pharoah, P.
    Caldas, C.
    Wishart, G. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (08) : 1338 - 1344
  • [36] Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival
    S J Dawson
    S W Duffy
    F M Blows
    K E Driver
    E Provenzano
    J LeQuesne
    D C Greenberg
    P Pharoah
    C Caldas
    G C Wishart
    British Journal of Cancer, 2009, 101 : 1338 - 1344
  • [38] Characteristics of Screen-Detected Breast Cancer with and without 3D Tomography
    Peters, Jessica
    Zuckerman, Samantha
    Conant, Emily
    Bleiweiss, Ira
    Nayak, Anupma
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 238 - 238
  • [39] Characteristics of Screen-Detected Breast Cancer with and without 3D Tomography
    Peters, Jessica
    Zuckerman, Samantha
    Conant, Emily
    Bleiweiss, Ira
    Nayak, Anupma
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 238 - 238
  • [40] Interhospital variation in surgical treatment of screen-detected breast cancer in the South of the Netherlands
    van der Veer, Eline L.
    Coolen, Angela M. P.
    Bluekens, Adriana M. J.
    Generaal, Manon I.
    Schipper, Robert-Jan
    Setz-Pels, Wikke
    van Uden, Dominique J. P.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    BREAST, 2025, 80