Intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy for paranasal sinus tumors

被引:16
|
作者
Nag, S
Tippin, D
Grecula, J
Schuller, D
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Arthur G James Canc Hosp, Div Radiat Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Arthur G James Canc Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Solove Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
head-and-neck cancers; brachytherapy; high dose rate;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01438-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Advanced and recurrent tumors of the paranasal sinuses can be difficult to irradiate to high doses with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), conventional brachytherapy, or intraoperative electron beams. We, therefore, explored the role of intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IOHDR) as a boost to EBRT in primary tumors or as sole adjuvant treatment in recurrent disease. Methods and Materials: Between 1992 and 1998, 34 patients with locally advanced tumors arising in the paranasal sinuses were treated with IOHDR after maximal surgical excision. Twenty-seven patients with new primaries underwent gross resection and 10-12.5 Gy IOHDR followed by 45-50 Gy EBRT. Seven previously irradiated (45-63 Gy) patients with recurrent disease were treated with 15-20 Gy of IOHDR alone after gross excision. Local control and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: After a mean follow-up of 6 years (range 34-120 months), the 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rate was 80%, 62%, and 44%, respectively. The overall local control rate at 1 and 5 years was 75% and 65%, respectively, and distant failure was documented in 44% of patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that the presence of gross disease after surgical resection was the strongest prognosticator, with a 5-year survival and local control rate of 17% and 50%, respectively, compared with 60% and 68%, respectively, for microscopic disease. The local control rates of patients with new primaries were similar to those of patients treated for recurrent disease (63% vs. 71%), probably because gross residual disease occurred only in the group of patients with new primaries. The addition of EBRT to IOHDR increased the 5-year disease-free survival rate from 27% to 44% but had no effect on local control (64% vs. 65%). Conclusion: IOHDR can be safely used to deliver a high radiation dose to locally advanced and recurrent tumors in the paranasal sinuses. In an attempt to improve outcome, we are now adding limited-dose EBRT (20-30 Gy) after 17.5 Gy of IOHDR in previously irradiated patients and increasing the EBRT dose for both microscopic (50-54 Gy) and gross residual disease (60-65 Gy) after 15 Gy of IOHDR in previously unirradiated patients. Chemosensitization should also be considered in previously irradiated patients and in those with gross residual disease. Interstitial boosting techniques, which can deliver higher doses at depth, should also be considered in patients with gross residual disease. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 160
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL-CARCINOMA
    STITT, JA
    THOMADSEN, BR
    FOWLER, JF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 24 (03): : 574 - 574
  • [32] QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL FOR HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY
    DEWERD, LA
    JURSINIC, P
    KITCHEN, R
    THOMADSEN, BR
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (04) : 435 - 440
  • [33] Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in eyelid cancer
    Mareco, Virginia
    Bujor, Laurentiu
    Abrunhosa-Branquinho, Andre N.
    Ferreira, Miguel Reis
    Ribeiro, Tiago
    Vasconcelos, Ana Luisa
    Ferreira, Cidalina Reis
    Jorge, Marilia
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (04) : 554 - 564
  • [34] FRACTIONATED HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR INTRACRANIAL GLIOMAS
    WOO, S
    BUTLER, EB
    GRANT, W
    BERNER, B
    GILDENBERG, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (01): : 247 - 249
  • [35] A quality assurance tool for high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Rickey, Daniel W.
    Sasaki, David
    Bews, Jeff
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 2525 - 2532
  • [36] Postoperative Management of Keloids with High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy
    Durante, S.
    Vavassori, A.
    Franzetti, J.
    Rotondi, M.
    Comi, S.
    Cambria, R.
    Cattani, F.
    De Lorenzi, F.
    Rietjens, M.
    Lazzari, R.
    Orecchia, R.
    Fossa, B. A. Jereczek
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1613 - S1613
  • [37] High-dose-rate brachytherapy in uterine cervical carcinoma
    Patel, FD
    Rai, B
    Mallick, I
    Sharma, SC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (01): : 125 - 130
  • [38] Developing a High-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Program
    Waring, Jayne
    Gosselin, Tracy
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [39] High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in prostate cancer
    Rebecca Kelsey
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2015, 12 (7) : 359 - 359
  • [40] Biologic treatment planning for high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Manning, MA
    Zwicker, RD
    Arthur, DW
    Arnfield, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03): : 839 - 845