Validation of NEMA NU4-2008 Scatter Fraction estimation with 18F and 68Ga for the ARGUS small-animal PET scanner

被引:0
|
作者
Vicente, E. [1 ,2 ]
Herraiz, J. L. [1 ]
Canadas, M. [3 ]
Cal-Gonzalez, J. [1 ]
Espana, S. [4 ,5 ]
Desco, M. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Vaquero, J. J. [6 ]
Udias, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dpto Fis Atom Mol & Nucl, Grp Fis Nucl, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] CSIC, Inst Estruct Mat, Madrid, Spain
[3] CIEMAT Ctr Invest Energeticas Medioambientales &, Madrid, Spain
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Bioingn & Ingn Aeroesp, Madrid, Spain
[7] Univ Gregorio Maranon, Gen Hosp, Unidad Med & Cirugia Expt, Madrid, Spain
[8] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The scatter fraction (SF) in PET data represents the fraction of coincidence events in which at least one of the two emitted photons have been scattered before being detected. It is usually estimated as the ratio of scattered events to total number of coincidences, when the number of random counts is negligible (less than 1% of true rates). SF provides a measurement of the relative sensitivity of the scanner to scattered radiation. It depends on object size, density and location inside the field of view, as well as on detector size, type of detector crystal and energy window. The performance evaluation guideline for small-animal PET NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) NU4-2008 proposes the estimation of the SF for three test phantoms made in proportion to the most widely used small animals in the laboratory: mouse, rat and monkey. The method estimates the different coincidence types in sinogram profiles from an off-centered line source inserted in these phantoms. We benchmark the procedure proposed by NEMA to estimate SF with F-18 and also with Ga-68, a radionuclide with lager positron range. Real data acquired with the ARGUS small-animal PET scanner (SEDECAL, Madrid, Spain) as well as simulations of the same scanner with peneloPET are used. The results show that, though SF should be practically the same with both F-18 and Ga-68 isotopes (and indeed our simulations indicate this) NEMA SF estimations with Ga-68 acquisitions are higher. This is due to the fact that Ga-68 positron range affects on the width of the line source profiles. Suggestions to modify the protocol to obtain similar SF estimations when using isotopes with larger positron range than F-18 are made.
引用
收藏
页码:3553 / 3557
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [11] Performance Evaluation of a Digital PET/CT Based on NEMA NU2-2018 Protocol and Jaszczak Phantom Analysis: Comparison Between 68Ga and 18F
    Alabdoaburas, M. M.
    Champion, L.
    Schmitt, C.
    Ammour, L.
    Provost, C.
    Belshi, R.
    Belly-Poinsignon, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E546 - E547
  • [12] Image quality as a function of reconstruction algorithms and their parameter settings for the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner evaluated using the NEMA NU4 2008 standards
    Visser, E. P.
    Disselhorst, J. A.
    van Lier, M. G. J. T.
    Laverman, P.
    Gotthardt, M.
    Oyen, W. J. G.
    Boerman, O. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 : S171 - S171
  • [13] First Test Results of a Commercially Available Clinical PET Scanner Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Small Animal PET Standards
    Luo, Weidong
    Anashkin, Edward
    Matthews, Chris G.
    2008 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (2008 NSS/MIC), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 3991 - 3996
  • [14] Characterization and optimization of image quality as a function of reconstruction algorithms and parameter settings in a Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards
    Visser, Eric P.
    Disselhorst, Jonathan A.
    van Lier, Monique G. J. T. B.
    Laverman, Peter
    de Jong, Gabie M.
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    Boerman, Otto C.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2011, 629 (01): : 357 - 367
  • [15] NEMA NU 4-2008 Performance Measurements of Two Commercial Small-Animal PET Scanners: ClearPET and rPET-1
    Canadas, Mario
    Embid, Miguel
    Lage, Eduardo
    Desco, Manuel
    Jose Vaquero, Juan
    Manuel Perez, Jose
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2011, 58 (01) : 58 - 65
  • [16] Investigation of Image Reconstruction Parameters of the Mediso nanoScan PC Small-Animal PET/CT Scanner for Two Different Positron Emitters Under NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards
    Anastasios Gaitanis
    George A. Kastis
    Elena Vlastou
    Penelope Bouziotis
    Panayotis Verginis
    Constantinos D. Anagnostopoulos
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2017, 19 : 550 - 559
  • [17] Investigation of Image Reconstruction Parameters of the Mediso nanoScan PC Small-Animal PET/CT Scanner for Two Different Positron Emitters Under NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards
    Gaitanis, Anastasios
    Kastis, George A.
    Vlastou, Elena
    Bouziotis, Penelope
    Verginis, Panayotis
    Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos D.
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 19 (04) : 550 - 559
  • [18] CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [68Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [18F]FDG-PET
    Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
    Raderer, Markus
    Lamm, Wolfgang
    Pichler, Verena
    Pfaff, Sarah
    Weber, Michael
    Kiesewetter, Barbara
    Hacker, Markus
    Kazianka, Lukas
    Staber, Philipp B.
    Wester, Hans-Juergen
    Rohrbeck, Johannes
    Simonitsch-Klupp, Ingrid
    Haug, Alexander
    THERANOSTICS, 2021, 11 (02): : 567 - 578
  • [19] Evaluation of a 24 cm-axial field of view PET/CT system using 18F/68Ga NEMA phantoms emulating different patient BMI
    Bisello, F.
    Macis, C.
    Della Gala, G.
    Santoro, M.
    Zagni, F.
    Strolin, S.
    Civollani, S.
    Maccagnani, M.
    Fanti, S.
    Strigari, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2024, 51 : S710 - S710
  • [20] Dual [68Ga]DOTATATE and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a multicentre validation of the NETPET score
    David L. Chan
    Aimee R. Hayes
    Ioannis Karfis
    Alice Conner
    Luke Furtado O’Mahony
    Magdalena Mileva
    Elizabeth Bernard
    Paul Roach
    Gwennaëlle Marin
    Nick Pavlakis
    Geoffrey Schembri
    Gopinath Gnanasegaran
    Clementine Marin
    Bruno Vanderlinden
    Shaunak Navalkissoor
    Martyn E. Caplin
    Patrick Flamen
    Christos Toumpanakis
    Dale L. Bailey
    British Journal of Cancer, 2023, 128 : 549 - 555