Extra-abdominal removal of placenta during cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial of a novel technique

被引:5
|
作者
Kaya, Baris [1 ]
Guralp, Onur [2 ]
Daglar, Korkut [3 ]
Tuten, Abdullah [4 ]
Demirol, Aygul [1 ]
Yayci, Eyup [1 ]
Atacag, Tijen [1 ]
Dogan, Askin [5 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Lefkosa TRNC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Mersin 10, Turkey
[2] Klinikum Oldenburg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oldenburg, Germany
[3] Zekai Tahir Burak Womens Hlth & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Univ Jena, Obstet & Gynecol, Jena, Germany
关键词
Cesarean section; extra-abdominal placental removal; placental delivery; PERIOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; UTERINE EXTERIORIZATION; ADHESION PREVENTION; MANUAL REMOVAL; BLOOD-LOSS; DELIVERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2015-0330
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of a novel placenta delivery technique; extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta during cesarean section (CS). Methods: A total of 210 women delivering by CS at term in a tertiary university hospital between March 2014 and January 2015 were randomized to extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta. The women were randomly allocated to the extra-(group 1) or intra-abdominal removal group (group 2) according to random sampling method, where women with even and odd numbers were allocated to intra- and extra-abdominal groups, respectively. The amount of intra-abdominal hemorrhagic fluid accumulation, the duration of operation and estimated blood loss during operation were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included the mean difference between pre- and post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, the mean postoperative pain score, any additional need of analgesia, postoperative bowel function, postoperative endometritis and wound infections. Results: The amount of aspirated hemorrhagic fluid was significantly higher in the intra-abdominal group compared to the extra-abdominal group (34.6 +/- 22.2 mL vs. 9.4 +/- 4.8 mL, P<0.001). Mean duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative requirement of additional analgesia, postoperative pain scores, postoperative endometritis or wound infection, and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the intra-and extra-abdominal placental removal groups. Conclusion: By extra-abdominal removal of the placenta, the accumulation of bloody fluid in the abdominal cavity is significantly less compared to the intra-abdominal removal method, which, in turn, provides avoidance of excessive mounted-gauze use, intra-abdominal manipulations, or iatrogenic trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 565
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RETRACTION: A sandwich technique (N&H variation technique) to reduce blood loss during cesarean delivery for complete placenta previa: a randomized controlled trial
    Sallam, Hany F.
    Shady, Nahla W.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2025, 38 (01):
  • [32] Effectiveness of aortic balloon occlusion in reducing blood loss during cesarean section in placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Bapayeva, Gauri
    Aimagambetova, Gulzhanat
    Kadroldinova, Nazira
    Zemlyanskiy, Viktor
    Kassymbek, Kuat
    Terzic, Milan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [33] Temporary clamping of the uterine arteries versus coventional technique for the prevention of postpartum hemorrage during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial study
    Gomez-Castellano, Manuel
    Sabonet- Morente, Lorena
    Lopez-Zambrano, Maria Alejandra
    de Miguel-Luken, Veronica
    Jimenez-Lopez, Jesus Salvador
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] The Hormonal Milieu by Different Labor Induction Methods in Women with Previous Cesarean Section: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wolf, Maya Frank
    Sgayer, Inshirah
    Asslan, Areej
    Palzur, Eilam
    Shnaider, Oleg
    Bornstein, Jacob
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (12) : 3562 - 3570
  • [35] The Hormonal Milieu by Different Labor Induction Methods in Women with Previous Cesarean Section: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Maya Frank Wolf
    Inshirah Sgayer
    Areej Asslan
    Eilam Palzur
    Oleg Shnaider
    Jacob Bornstein
    Reproductive Sciences, 2021, 28 : 3562 - 3570
  • [36] Does manual removal of the placenta affect operative blood loss during cesarean section?
    Gol, M
    Baloglu, A
    Aydin, Ç
    Ova, L
    Yensel, U
    Karci, L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 112 (01): : 57 - 60
  • [37] Babu and Magon uterine closure technique during cesarean section: A randomized double-blind trial
    Tahermanesh, Kobra
    Mirgalobayat, Shahla
    Aziz-Ahari, Alireza
    Maleki, Maryam
    Hashemi, Neda
    Samimi, Mansooreh
    Anvari-Yazdi, Abbas Fazel
    Shahriyaripour, Roya
    Pecks, Ulrich
    Allahqoli, Leila
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (09) : 3186 - 3195
  • [38] Comparison between the modified French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section and standard cesarean technique- a randomized double-blind controlled trial
    Sagi, Shlomi
    Bleicher, Inna
    Bakhous, Rabia
    Pelts, Amir
    Talhamy, Samira
    Caspin, Orna
    Sammour, Rami
    Sagi-Dain, Lena
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (07)
  • [39] Neonatal effects after vasopressor during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
    Uerpairojkit, K.
    Anusorntanawat, R.
    Sirisabya, A.
    Chaichalothorn, M.
    Charuluxananan, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 32 : 41 - 47
  • [40] The effect of mechanical cervical dilatation during scheduled cesarean section on the blood loss: a randomized controlled trial
    El-Sharkawy, Mohamed
    Samy, Ahmed
    Latif, Dina
    Mahmoud, Mostafa
    Samir, Dalia
    Abbas, Ahmed M.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (12): : 2043 - 2048