Extra-abdominal removal of placenta during cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial of a novel technique

被引:5
|
作者
Kaya, Baris [1 ]
Guralp, Onur [2 ]
Daglar, Korkut [3 ]
Tuten, Abdullah [4 ]
Demirol, Aygul [1 ]
Yayci, Eyup [1 ]
Atacag, Tijen [1 ]
Dogan, Askin [5 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Lefkosa TRNC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Mersin 10, Turkey
[2] Klinikum Oldenburg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oldenburg, Germany
[3] Zekai Tahir Burak Womens Hlth & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Univ Jena, Obstet & Gynecol, Jena, Germany
关键词
Cesarean section; extra-abdominal placental removal; placental delivery; PERIOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; UTERINE EXTERIORIZATION; ADHESION PREVENTION; MANUAL REMOVAL; BLOOD-LOSS; DELIVERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2015-0330
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of a novel placenta delivery technique; extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta during cesarean section (CS). Methods: A total of 210 women delivering by CS at term in a tertiary university hospital between March 2014 and January 2015 were randomized to extra-abdominal removal vs. intra-abdominal removal of the placenta. The women were randomly allocated to the extra-(group 1) or intra-abdominal removal group (group 2) according to random sampling method, where women with even and odd numbers were allocated to intra- and extra-abdominal groups, respectively. The amount of intra-abdominal hemorrhagic fluid accumulation, the duration of operation and estimated blood loss during operation were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included the mean difference between pre- and post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, the mean postoperative pain score, any additional need of analgesia, postoperative bowel function, postoperative endometritis and wound infections. Results: The amount of aspirated hemorrhagic fluid was significantly higher in the intra-abdominal group compared to the extra-abdominal group (34.6 +/- 22.2 mL vs. 9.4 +/- 4.8 mL, P<0.001). Mean duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative requirement of additional analgesia, postoperative pain scores, postoperative endometritis or wound infection, and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the intra-and extra-abdominal placental removal groups. Conclusion: By extra-abdominal removal of the placenta, the accumulation of bloody fluid in the abdominal cavity is significantly less compared to the intra-abdominal removal method, which, in turn, provides avoidance of excessive mounted-gauze use, intra-abdominal manipulations, or iatrogenic trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 565
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A sandwich technique (N&H variation technique) to reduce blood loss during cesarean delivery for complete placenta previa: a randomized controlled trial
    Sallam, Hany F.
    Shady, Nahla W.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (19): : 3145 - 3152
  • [22] Effect of anesthesiological strategies on neonatal bilirubin levels during cesarean section: a prospective and randomized trial
    Yavuz Demiraran
    Mustafa Albayrak
    Ilknur Suidiye Seker
    Gursel Kaynak
    Abdulkadir Iskender
    Gulbin Yalcin Sezen
    Ismail Ozdemir
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 284 : 1059 - 1065
  • [23] A novel hemostatic technique during cesarean section for placenta previa: combining "cervical inversion" and "holding the cervix"
    Matsubara, S.
    Takahashi, H.
    Lefor, A. K.
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2015, 67 (05): : 488 - 489
  • [24] Effect of anesthesiological strategies on neonatal bilirubin levels during cesarean section: a prospective and randomized trial
    Demiraran, Yavuz
    Albayrak, Mustafa
    Seker, Ilknur Suidiye
    Kaynak, Gursel
    Iskender, Abdulkadir
    Sezen, Gulbin Yalcin
    Ozdemir, Ismail
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 284 (05) : 1059 - 1065
  • [25] Comparison of visual analog pain scores of two different abdominal incisions for Cesarean section: A prospective randomized trial
    Soysal, Sunullah
    Ugur, Mustafa
    Var, Turgut
    MARMARA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 26 (03): : 142 - 145
  • [26] Abdominal irrigation during cesarean section: is it beneficial for the control of postoperative pain and gastrointestinal disturbance? A randomized controlled, double-blind trial
    Sargin, Mehmet Akif
    Yassa, Murat
    Turunc, Mehmet
    Karadogan, Firdevs Ozdemir
    Aydin, Sibel
    Tug, Niyazi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (02): : 3416 - 3424
  • [27] The efficacy of intrauterine misoprostol during cesarean section in prevention of primary PPH, a randomized controlled trial
    Alalfy, Mahmoud
    Lasheen, Yossra
    Elshenoufy, Hossam
    Elzahaby, I. M.
    Kaleem, Heba W.
    El Sawah, Heba
    Azkalani, Ahmed
    Saber, Waleed
    Rashwan, Ahmed S. S. A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (09): : 1459 - 1465
  • [28] Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incision in women undergoing repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
    Elbohoty, Ahmed E. H.
    Gomaa, Mostafa F.
    Abdelaleim, Mohamed
    Abd-El-Gawad, Magdi
    Elmarakby, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (10) : 1541 - 1546
  • [29] Early versus delayed removal of indwelling catheters in patients after elective cesarean section: a prospective randomized trial
    Basbug, Alper
    Yuksel, Alpaslan
    Kaya, Aski Ellibes
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (01): : 68 - 72
  • [30] Prospective Randomized Control Trial Comparing Early Versus Delayed Removal of an Indwelling Catheter Following Cesarean Section
    Zilo, Crystal
    Hagglund, Karen
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 23 (04) : 20 - 20