Facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: An academic center's initial experience

被引:26
|
作者
Amini, Marzyeh [1 ]
Oemrawsingh, Arvind [1 ]
Verweij, Lisanne M. [2 ]
Lingsma, Hester F. [1 ]
Hazelzet, Jan A. [1 ]
Eijkenaar, Frank [3 ]
van Leeuwen, Nikki [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Ctr Med Decis Making, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Surveys and questionnaires; Implementation; Value-based healthcare; Facilitators and barriers; Health services research; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH OUTCOMES; APPROVAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of healthcare providers and researchers in a large academic hospital on facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical care. Methods A customized web-based questionnaire was developed and disseminated to healthcare providers and researchers across multiple medical departments involved in a value-based health care initiative in the hospital. Questionnaire statements were rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree". In addition, 8 open-ended questions were included allowing respondents to mention additional facilitators and barriers for implementing PROMs. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Results In total, 61 participants from both surgical and non-surgical departments completed the survey. Most respondents (51%) were medical specialists and the median employment duration was 14 years. Frequently reported facilitators were the presence of a PROM coordinator in the (outpatient) clinic (85%), the integration of PROMs in the electronic health record (81%), and the intrinsic motivation of members involved in the implementation (N = 9 open responses). Commonly reported barriers were language barriers (76%), IT issues (N = 17 open responses), and time constraints (N = 14 open responses). Conclusions For the successful implementation of PROMs in clinical practice, it is imperative that healthcare organizations consider supporting motivated healthcare professionals, involving PROMs coordinators, and investing in an adequate IT infrastructure, and removal of language barriers. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:1247 / 1255
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Rehabilitation Settings: A Systematic Review of Facilitators and Barriers Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Briggs, Matthew S.
    Rethman, Katherine Kozak
    Crookes, Justin
    Cheek, Fern
    Pottkotter, E. Kristy
    McGrath, Shana
    DeWitt, John
    Harmon-Matthews, Lindsay E.
    Quatman-Yates, Catherine C.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 101 (10): : 1796 - 1812
  • [22] Initial Clinical Experience of Routine Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at the Christie NHS Foundation Trust
    Crockett, C.
    Faivre-Finn, C.
    Yorke, J.
    Price, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04) : E168 - E168
  • [23] Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance
    Bull, Claudia
    Teede, Helena
    Watson, Diane
    Callander, Emily J.
    [J]. JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [24] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [25] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (05): : 472 - 473
  • [26] Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide
    Eric K. H. Chan
    Todd C. Edwards
    Kirstie Haywood
    Sean P. Mikles
    Louise Newton
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 621 - 627
  • [27] Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide
    Chan, Eric K. H.
    Edwards, Todd C.
    Haywood, Kirstie
    Mikles, Sean P.
    Newton, Louise
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) : 621 - 627
  • [28] Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine head and neck cancer care: What do health professionals perceive as barriers and facilitators?
    Nguyen, Hanh
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Morris, Lucinda
    Brown, Alison
    West, Katrina
    Sundaresan, Puma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (05) : 704 - 710
  • [29] Patient experience with patient-reported outcome measures in neurologic practice
    Lapin, Brittany
    Udeh, Belinda
    Bautista, Jocelyn F.
    Katzan, Irene L.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (12) : E1135 - E1151
  • [30] Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Perinatal Care to Guide Clinical Practice: Prospective Observational Study
    Depla, Anne Louise
    Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije
    Laureij, Lyzette
    Ernst-Smelt, Hiske E.
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    Franx, Arie
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    BUZZ Project Team
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (07)