Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Perinatal Care to Guide Clinical Practice: Prospective Observational Study

被引:12
|
作者
Depla, Anne Louise [1 ]
Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije [1 ,2 ]
Laureij, Lyzette [2 ]
Ernst-Smelt, Hiske E. [2 ]
Hazelzet, Jan A. [3 ]
Franx, Arie [2 ]
Bekker, Mireille N. [1 ,4 ]
BUZZ Project Team
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Wilhemina Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Med Ctr Sophia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Obstet & Fetal Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Wilhemina Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lundlaan 6, NL-3584 EA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
perinatal care; patient-reported outcomes; patient-reported experiences; patient-centered outcome measures; value-based health care; shared decision-making; personalized care; integrated care;
D O I
10.2196/37725
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement has published a set of patient-centered outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth (PCB set), including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). To establish value-based pregnancy and childbirth care, the PCB set was implemented in the Netherlands, using the outcomes on the patient level for shared decision-making and on an aggregated level for quality improvement. Objective: This study aims to report first outcomes, experiences, and practice insights of implementing the PCB set in clinical practice. Methods: In total, 7 obstetric care networks across the Netherlands, each consisting of 1 or 2 hospitals and multiple community midwifery practices (ranging in number from 2 to 18), implemented the PROM and PREM domains of the PCB set as part of clinical routine. This observational study included all women participating in the clinical project. PROMs and PREMs were assessed with questionnaires at 5 time points: 2 during pregnancy and 3 post partum. Clinical threshold values (alerts) supported care professionals interpreting the answers, indicating possibly alarming outcomes per domain Data collection took place from February 2020 to September 2021. Data analysis included missing (pattern) analysis, sum scores, alert rates, and sensitivity analysis. Results: In total, 1923 questionnaires were collected across the 5 time points: 816 (42.43%) at T1 (first trimester), 793 (41.23%) at T2 (early third trimester), 125 (6.5%) at T3 (maternity week), 170 (8.84%) at T4 (6 weeks post partum), and 19 (1%) at T5 (6 months post partum). Of these, 84% (1615/1923) were filled out completely. Missing items per domain ranged from 0% to 13%, with the highest missing rates for depression, pain with intercourse, and experience with pain relief at birth. No notable missing patterns were found. For the PROM domains, relatively high alert rates were found both in pregnancy and post partum for incontinence (469/1798, 26.08%), pain with intercourse (229/1005, 22.79%), breastfeeding self-efficacy (175/765, 22.88%), and mother-child bonding (122/288, 42.36%). Regarding the PREM domains, the highest alert rates were found for birth experience (37/170, 21.76%), shared decision-making (101/982, 10.29%), and discussing pain relief ante partum (310/793, 39.09%). Some domains showed very little clinical variation; for example, role of the mother and satisfaction with care. Conclusions: The PCB set is a useful tool to assess patient-reported outcomes and experiences that need to be addressed over the whole course of pregnancy and childbirth. Our results provide opportunities to improve and personalize perinatal care. Furthermore, we could propose several recommendations regarding methods and timeline of measurements based on our findings. This study supports the implementation of the PCB set in clinical practice, thereby advancing the transformation toward patient-centered, value-based health care for pregnancy and childbirth.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient reported outcomes and experience measures in perinatal care to guide clinical practice: the first results
    Depla, Anne Louise
    Lamain-Ruiter, Marije
    Laureij, Lyzette L.
    Ernst-Smelt, Hiske
    Hazelzet, Jan
    Franx, Arie
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [2] Patient experience with patient-reported outcome measures in neurologic practice
    Lapin, Brittany
    Udeh, Belinda
    Bautista, Jocelyn F.
    Katzan, Irene L.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (12) : E1135 - E1151
  • [3] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Trujols, Joan
    Duran-Sindreu, Santiago
    Portella, Maria J.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 110 - 110
  • [4] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Pain, Tilley
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Girgis, Afaf
    Hoffman, Anna
    Karnon, Jonathan
    King, Madeleine T.
    Shah, Karan K.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 216 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges IN REPLY
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Morton, Rachael L.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 111 - 111
  • [6] Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide
    Eric K. H. Chan
    Todd C. Edwards
    Kirstie Haywood
    Sean P. Mikles
    Louise Newton
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 621 - 627
  • [7] Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide
    Chan, Eric K. H.
    Edwards, Todd C.
    Haywood, Kirstie
    Mikles, Sean P.
    Newton, Louise
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) : 621 - 627
  • [8] Choosing and Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice
    Kroenke, Kurt
    Miksch, Timothy A.
    Spaulding, Aaron C.
    Mazza, Gina L.
    DeStephano, Christopher C.
    Niazi, Shehzad K.
    Illies, Allie J. Canoy
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Novotny, Paull
    Goyal, Anshit
    Lee, Minji K.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 103 (05): : S108 - S117
  • [9] A patient-centred approach to measuring quality in kidney care: patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan L.
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Anderson, Nicola
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2017, 26 (06): : 442 - 449
  • [10] Patient-reported experience measures in deprescribing for hospitalised older patients: a prospective, multicentre, observational study
    Ngui, Keat
    Lam, Patrick
    Materne, Mishael
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 53 (06) : 1027 - 1031