Optimizing the Huff 'n' Puff Gas Injection Performance in Shale Reservoirs Considering the Uncertainty: A Duvernay Shale Example

被引:9
|
作者
Hamdi, Hamidreza [1 ]
Clarkson, Christopher R. [1 ]
Esmail, Ali [2 ]
Sousa, Mario Costa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Ovintiv Corp, Denver, CO USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
RESPONSE-SURFACE METHODOLOGY; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; HISTORY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.2118/195438-PA
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Recent studies have indicated that huff 'n' puff (HNP) gas injection has the potential to recover an additional 30 to 70% oil from multifractured horizontal wells in shale reservoirs. Nonetheless, this technique is very sensitive to production constraints and is impacted by uncertainty related to measurement quality (particularly frequency and resolution) and lack of constraining data. In this paper, a Bayesian workflow is provided to optimize the HNP process under uncertainty using a Duvernay shale well as an example. Compositional simulations are conducted that incorporate a tuned pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) model and a set of measured cyclic injection/compaction pressure-sensitive permeability data. Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is used to estimate the posterior distributions of the model uncertain variables by matching the primary production data. The MCMC process is accelerated by using an accurate proxy model (kriging) that is updated using a highly adaptive sampling algorithm. Gaussian processes are then used to optimize the HNP control variables by maximizing the lower confidence interval (l-r) of cumulative oil production (after 10 years) across a fixed ensemble of uncertain variables sampled from posterior distributions. The uncertain variable space includes several parameters representing reservoir and fracture properties. The posterior distributions for some parameters, such as primary fracture permeability and effective half-length, are narrower, whereas wider distributions are obtained for other parameters. The results indicate that the impact of uncertain variables on HNP performance is nonlinear. Some uncertain variables (such as molecular diffusion) that do not show strong sensitivity during the primary production strongly impact gas injection HNP performance. The results of optimization under uncertainty confirm that the lower confidence interval of cumulative oil production can be maximized by an injection time of approximately 1.5 months, a production time of approximately 2.5 months, and very short soaking times. In addition, a maximum injection rate and a flowing bottomhole pressure around the bubblepoint are required to ensure maximum incremental recovery. Analysis of the objective function surface highlights some other sets of production constraints with competitive results. Finally, the optimal set of production constraints, in combination with an ensemble of uncertain variables, results in a median HNP cumulative oil production that is 30% greater than that for primary production. The application of a Bayesian framework for optimizing the HNP performance in a real shale reservoir is introduced for the first time. This work provides practical guidelines for the efficient application of advanced techniques for optimization under uncertainty, resulting in better decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 237
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research on Mechanism and Effect of Enhancing Gas Recovery by CO2 Huff-n-Puff in Shale Gas Reservoir
    Liu, Jiawei
    Xie, Mengke
    Liu, Dongchen
    Cao, Lieyan
    Xie, Shengyang
    Chang, Ying
    Zhang, Jian
    Yang, Xuefeng
    [J]. ACS OMEGA, 2024, 9 (30): : 33111 - 33118
  • [42] Enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs by gas injection
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 22 : 252 - 259
  • [43] Sensitivity and history match analysis of a carbon dioxide "huff-and-puff" injection test in a horizontal shale gas well in Tennessee
    Keles, C.
    Tang, X.
    Schlosser, C.
    Louk, A. K.
    Ripepi, N. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 77
  • [44] Re-Fracturing vs. CO2 Huff-n-Puff Injection in a Tight Shale Reservoir for Enhancing Gas Production
    Wang, Dong
    Li, Yongming
    Wang, Bo
    Shan, Jiquan
    Dai, Libin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 10
  • [45] Application of self-learning enhancing Huff and Puff gas injection optimization in shale reservoirs through sequence-based proxy reservoir simulation and reinforcement learning
    Aranguren, Cristhian
    Aguilera, Roberto
    [J]. GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 234
  • [46] CO2-EOR mechanisms in huff-n-puff operations in shale oil reservoirs based on history matching results
    Alfarge, Dheiaa
    Wei, Mingzhen
    Bai, Baojun
    [J]. FUEL, 2018, 226 : 112 - 120
  • [47] Investigation of asphaltene-derived formation damage and nano-confinement on the performance of CO2 huff-n-puff in shale oil reservoirs
    Lee, Ji Ho
    Lee, Kun Sang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 182
  • [48] Investigation of asphaltene deposition mechanisms during CO2 huff-n-puff injection in Eagle Ford shale
    Shen, Ziqi
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (20) : 1960 - 1966
  • [49] Characteristics of Crude Oil Production in Microscopic Pores of CO2 Huff and Puff in Shale Oil Reservoirs
    Song, Shunyao
    Chang, Jiajing
    Guan, Quansheng
    Song, Zhaojie
    Wan, Yonggang
    Zhang, Kaixing
    Xu, Jing
    Fan, Zhaoyu
    Zhang, Yang
    Wang, Haizhu
    Liu, Xuewei
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Ma, Zhongmei
    [J]. Energy and Fuels, 2024, 38 (05): : 3982 - 3996
  • [50] Evaluation of CO2 injection into shale gas reservoirs considering dispersed distribution of kerogen
    Huang, Jingwei
    Jin, Tianying
    Barrufet, Maria
    Killough, John
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 260