Do larger genomes contain more diverse transposable elements?

被引:55
|
作者
Elliott, Tyler A. [1 ]
Gregory, T. Ryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
来源
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
C-value; DNA transposon; Genome sequencing; LTR retrotransposon; LINE; SINE; RETROTRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; LTR-RETROTRANSPOSONS; EVOLUTION; SEQUENCE; DATABASE; POPULATION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12862-015-0339-8
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The genomes of eukaryotes vary enormously in size, with much of this diversity driven by differences in the abundances of transposable elements (TEs). There is also substantial structural and phylogenetic diversity among TEs, such that they can be classified into distinct classes, superfamilies, and families. Possible relationships between TE diversity (and not just abundance) and genome size have not been investigated to date, though there are reasons to expect either a positive or a negative correlation. This study compares data from 257 species of animals, plants, fungi, and "protists" to determine whether TE diversity at the superfamily level is related to genome size. Results: No simple relationship was found between TE diversity and genome size. There is no significant correlation across all eukaryotes, but there is a positive correlation for genomes below 500Mbp and a negative correlation among land plants. No relationships were found across animals or within vertebrates. Some TE superfamilies tend to be present across all major groups of eukaryotes, but there is considerable variance in TE diversity in different taxa. Conclusions: Differences in genome size are thought to arise primarily through accumulation of TEs, but beyond a certain point (similar to 500 Mbp), TE diversity does not increase with genome size. Several possible explanations for these complex patterns are discussed, and recommendations to facilitate future analyses are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of transposable elements in the melanogaster subgroup sequenced genomes
    Lerat, Emmanuelle
    Burlet, Nelly
    Biemont, Christian
    Vieira, Cristina
    [J]. GENE, 2011, 473 (02) : 100 - 109
  • [42] The Contributions of Transposable Elements to the Structure, Function, and Evolution of Plant Genomes
    Bennetzen, Jeffrey L.
    Wang, Hao
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, VOL 65, 2014, 65 : 505 - 530
  • [43] Methods for detection of horizontal transfer of transposable elements in complete genomes
    de Carvalho, Marcos Oliveira
    Loreto, Elgion L. S.
    [J]. GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (04) : 1078 - 1084
  • [44] hAT transposable elements and their derivatives: an analysis in the 12 Drosophila genomes
    Ortiz, Mauro de Freitas
    Lorenzatto, Karina Rodrigues
    Silva Correa, Bruna Renata
    Silva Loreto, Elgion Lucio
    [J]. GENETICA, 2010, 138 (06) : 649 - 655
  • [45] Characterization of new hAT transposable elements in 12 Drosophila genomes
    Mauro de Freitas Ortiz
    Elgion Lucio Silva Loreto
    [J]. Genetica, 2009, 135
  • [46] The DAWGPAWS pipeline for the annotation of genes and transposable elements in plant genomes
    James C Estill
    Jeffrey L Bennetzen
    [J]. Plant Methods, 5
  • [47] MORE TO TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS THAN MEETS THE EYE
    HASTIE, N
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 1987, 3 (04) : 85 - 86
  • [48] Less from more: cosuppression of transposable elements
    Birchler, JA
    Pal-Bhadra, M
    Bhadra, U
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 21 (02) : 148 - 149
  • [49] Less from more: cosuppression of transposable elements
    James A Birchler
    Manika Pal-Bhadra
    Utpal Bhadra
    [J]. Nature Genetics, 1999, 21 : 148 - 149
  • [50] Mammals with Small Populations Do Not Exhibit Larger Genomes
    Roddy, Adam B.
    Alvarez-Ponce, David
    Roy, Scott W.
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 38 (09) : 3737 - 3741