Do larger genomes contain more diverse transposable elements?

被引:55
|
作者
Elliott, Tyler A. [1 ]
Gregory, T. Ryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
来源
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
C-value; DNA transposon; Genome sequencing; LTR retrotransposon; LINE; SINE; RETROTRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; LTR-RETROTRANSPOSONS; EVOLUTION; SEQUENCE; DATABASE; POPULATION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12862-015-0339-8
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The genomes of eukaryotes vary enormously in size, with much of this diversity driven by differences in the abundances of transposable elements (TEs). There is also substantial structural and phylogenetic diversity among TEs, such that they can be classified into distinct classes, superfamilies, and families. Possible relationships between TE diversity (and not just abundance) and genome size have not been investigated to date, though there are reasons to expect either a positive or a negative correlation. This study compares data from 257 species of animals, plants, fungi, and "protists" to determine whether TE diversity at the superfamily level is related to genome size. Results: No simple relationship was found between TE diversity and genome size. There is no significant correlation across all eukaryotes, but there is a positive correlation for genomes below 500Mbp and a negative correlation among land plants. No relationships were found across animals or within vertebrates. Some TE superfamilies tend to be present across all major groups of eukaryotes, but there is considerable variance in TE diversity in different taxa. Conclusions: Differences in genome size are thought to arise primarily through accumulation of TEs, but beyond a certain point (similar to 500 Mbp), TE diversity does not increase with genome size. Several possible explanations for these complex patterns are discussed, and recommendations to facilitate future analyses are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Epigenetic Regulation of Mammalian Genomes by Transposable Elements
    Huda, Ahsan
    Jordan, I. King
    [J]. NATURAL GENETIC ENGINEERING AND NATURAL GENOME EDITING, 2009, 1178 : 276 - 284
  • [22] The genomes and transposable elements in plants: are they friends or foes?
    Nam-Soo Kim
    [J]. Genes & Genomics, 2017, 39 : 359 - 370
  • [23] Bioinformatics and genomic analysis of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes
    Mateusz Janicki
    Rebecca Rooke
    Guojun Yang
    [J]. Chromosome Research, 2011, 19 : 787 - 808
  • [24] Evolutionary and Adaptive Role of Transposable Elements in Fungal Genomes
    Grandaubert, Jonathan
    Balesdent, Marie-Helene
    Rouxel, Thierry
    [J]. FUNGI, 2014, 70 : 79 - 107
  • [25] Impact of transposable elements on the organization and function of allopolyploid genomes
    Parisod, Christian
    Alix, Karine
    Just, Jeremy
    Petit, Maud
    Sarilar, Veronique
    Mhiri, Corinne
    Ainouche, Malika
    Chalhoub, Boulos
    Grandbastien, Marie-Angele
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2010, 186 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [26] Constitutive Heterochromatin in Eukaryotic Genomes: A Mine of Transposable Elements
    Marsano, Rene Massimiliano
    Dimitri, Patrizio
    [J]. CELLS, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [27] Bioinformatics and genomic analysis of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes
    Janicki, Mateusz
    Rooke, Rebecca
    Yang, Guojun
    [J]. CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2011, 19 (06) : 787 - 808
  • [28] Taming, Domestication and Exaptation: Trajectories of Transposable Elements in Genomes
    Capy, Pierre
    [J]. CELLS, 2021, 10 (12)
  • [29] The Functional Impact of Transposable Elements on the Diversity of Plant Genomes
    Grzebelus, Dariusz
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (02):
  • [30] Transposable elements in gene regulation and in the evolution of vertebrate genomes
    Bourque, Guillaume
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 19 (06) : 607 - 612