Rank distributions: Frequency vs. magnitude

被引:9
|
作者
Velarde, Carlos [1 ]
Robledo, Alberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Matemat Aplicadas & Sistemas, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Fis & Ctr Ciencias Complejidad, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
LAWS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0186015
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We examine the relationship between two different types of ranked data, frequencies and magnitudes. We consider data that can be sorted out either way, through numbers of occurrences or size of the measures, as it is the case, say, of moon craters, earthquakes, billionaires, etc. We indicate that these two types of distributions are functional inverses of each other, and specify this link, first in terms of the assumed parent probability distribution that generates the data samples, and then in terms of an analog (deterministic) nonlinear iterated map that reproduces them. For the particular case of hyperbolic decay with rank the distributions are identical, that is, the classical Zipf plot, a pure power law. But their difference is largest when one displays logarithmic decay and its counterpart shows the inverse exponential decay, as it is the case of Benford law, or viceversa. For all intermediate decay rates generic differences appear not only between the power-law exponents for the midway rank decline but also for small and large rank. We extend the theoretical framework to include thermodynamic and statistical-mechanical concepts, such as entropies and configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BREAKS IN SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR: DURATION VS. FREQUENCY
    Gift, Kristin
    Ruggiero, Marissa
    Gray, Carolyn
    Rhudy, Matthew
    Veerabhadrappa, Praveen
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E481 - E481
  • [42] Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries
    Haspelmath, Martin
    COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 2008, 19 (01) : 1 - 33
  • [43] FREQUENCY COHERENT VS. TEMPORALLY COHERENT TARGETS
    Bovenga, F.
    Rana, F.
    Refice, A.
    Nitti, D. O.
    Veneziani, N.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2013, : 105 - 108
  • [44] Frequency, duration and recency vs. double stimulation
    Meyer, MF
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1934, 41 : 177 - 183
  • [45] Mechanomyographic amplitude and frequency vs. isometric torque relationships in women with higher vs. lower strength
    Gulick, Colleen N.
    Coburn, Jared W.
    Galpin, Andrew J.
    Costa, Pablo B.
    ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2016, 24 (04) : 295 - 300
  • [46] Earnings distributions of scalable vs. non-scalable occupations
    Maia, Adriano
    Matsushita, Raul
    Da Silva, Sergio
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 560
  • [47] METHODS FOR SOLVING THE JACOBI EQUATION. CONSTANT OSCULATING RANK VS. CONSTANT JACOBI OSCULATING RANK
    Arias-Marco, Teresa
    DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, 2009, : 207 - 216
  • [48] A weak goodness-of-fit test for rank-frequency distributions
    Rousseau, R
    SEVENTH CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, PROCEEDINGS - 1999, 1999, : 421 - 430
  • [49] METEOR MAGNITUDE DISTRIBUTIONS
    MILLMAN, PM
    BURLAND, MS
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1961, 66 (07): : 291 - 292
  • [50] Bilinear Magnitude-Frequency Distributions and Characteristic Earthquakes During Hydraulic Fracturing
    Igonin, Nadine
    Zecevic, Megan
    Eaton, David W.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (23) : 12866 - 12874