Rank distributions: Frequency vs. magnitude

被引:9
|
作者
Velarde, Carlos [1 ]
Robledo, Alberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Matemat Aplicadas & Sistemas, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Fis & Ctr Ciencias Complejidad, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
LAWS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0186015
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We examine the relationship between two different types of ranked data, frequencies and magnitudes. We consider data that can be sorted out either way, through numbers of occurrences or size of the measures, as it is the case, say, of moon craters, earthquakes, billionaires, etc. We indicate that these two types of distributions are functional inverses of each other, and specify this link, first in terms of the assumed parent probability distribution that generates the data samples, and then in terms of an analog (deterministic) nonlinear iterated map that reproduces them. For the particular case of hyperbolic decay with rank the distributions are identical, that is, the classical Zipf plot, a pure power law. But their difference is largest when one displays logarithmic decay and its counterpart shows the inverse exponential decay, as it is the case of Benford law, or viceversa. For all intermediate decay rates generic differences appear not only between the power-law exponents for the midway rank decline but also for small and large rank. We extend the theoretical framework to include thermodynamic and statistical-mechanical concepts, such as entropies and configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Visual sense of number vs. sense of magnitude in humans and machines
    Alberto Testolin
    Serena Dolfi
    Mathijs Rochus
    Marco Zorzi
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [22] Intuitions of "infinite numbers": Infinite magnitude vs. infinite representation
    Mamolo, Ami
    MATHEMATICS ENTHUSIAST, 2009, 6 (03):
  • [23] Visual sense of number vs. sense of magnitude in humans and machines
    Testolin, Alberto
    Dolfi, Serena
    Rochus, Mathijs
    Zorzi, Marco
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [24] Time vs. Money: A Quantitative Evaluation of Monitoring Frequency vs. Monitoring Duration
    McHugh, Thomas E.
    Kulkarni, Poonam R.
    Newell, Charles J.
    GROUNDWATER, 2016, 54 (05) : 692 - 698
  • [25] Dagum vs. Singh-Maddala income distributions
    Kleiber, C
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 53 (03) : 265 - 268
  • [26] Student vs. search engine: Undergraduates rank results for relevance
    Nowicki, S
    PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, 2003, 3 (03) : 503 - 515
  • [27] Distillation vs. Sampling for Efficient Training of Learning to Rank Models
    Khandel, Pooya
    Yates, Andrew
    Varbanescu, Ana-Lucia
    de Rijke, Maarten
    Pimentel, Andy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 ACM SIGIR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE THEORY OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, ICTIR 2024, 2024, : 51 - 60
  • [28] Integer partitions result in skewed rank-frequency distributions
    Windsor, DA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 53 (14): : 1276 - 1276
  • [29] Text mixing shapes the anatomy of rank-frequency distributions
    Williams, Jake Ryland
    Bagrow, James P.
    Danforth, Christopher M.
    Dodds, Peter Sheridan
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2015, 91 (05):
  • [30] THE KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV TEST AND RANK-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
    BURRELL, QL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1994, 45 (01): : 59 - 59