Does knowledge brokering facilitate evidence-based policy? A review of existing knowledge and an agenda for future research

被引:34
|
作者
MacKillop, Eleanor [1 ]
Quarmby, Sarah [1 ]
Downe, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
来源
POLICY AND POLITICS | 2020年 / 48卷 / 02期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
EBP; EBPM; evidence-based policy; evidence-based policymaking; knowledge brokering; knowledge brokers; knowledge mobilisation; what works; PUBLIC-HEALTH POLICY; BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE SCIENCE; BURKINA-FASO; MOBILIZATION; INTERMEDIARIES; SERVICES; EXCHANGE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1332/030557319X15740848311069
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The claim that evidence-based policy (EBP) produces better outcomes has gained increasing support over the last three decades. Knowledge brokering (KB) is seen as a way to achieve improved policymaking and governments worldwide are investing significant resources in KB initiatives. It is therefore important to understand the range of these activities and to investigate whether and how they facilitate EBP. This article critically reviews the extant literature on KB. It identifies six important limitations: the existence of multiple definitions of KB; a lack of theory-based empirical analysis; a neglect of knowledge brokering organisations; insufficient research on KB in social policy; limited analysis of impact and effectiveness; and a lack of attention to the role played by politics. The paper proposes an agenda for future research that bridges disciplinary boundaries in order to address these gaps and contribute new insights into the politics of evidence use.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 353
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evidence-based knowledge management: a topic modeling analysis of research on knowledge management and analytics
    Thakral, Priyanka
    Sharma, Dheeraj
    Ghosh, Koustab
    [J]. VINE JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2024,
  • [32] Evidence-based policy-making? The meaning of scientific knowledge in policy processes
    Saretzki, Thomas
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2019, 144 : 78 - 83
  • [33] Research-based knowledge: researchers' contribution to evidence-based practice and policy making in career guidance
    Haug, Erik Hagaseth
    Plant, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL AND VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE, 2016, 16 (01) : 137 - 152
  • [34] External commercialization of knowledge: Review and research agenda
    Lichtenthaler, U
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2005, 7 (04) : 231 - 255
  • [35] Knowledge hiding - a systematic review and research agenda
    Anand, Amitabh
    Offergelt, Florian
    Anand, Payal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (06) : 1438 - 1457
  • [36] Does prior knowledge facilitate the development of knowledge-based systems?
    Cohen, P
    Chaudhri, V
    Pease, A
    Schrag, R
    [J]. SIXTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-99)/ELEVENTH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IAAI-99), 1999, : 221 - 226
  • [37] THE FUTURE OF CONTEXTUAL KNOWLEDGE IN GAMING SIMULATIONS: A RESEARCH AGENDA
    Roungas, Bill
    Verbraeck, Alexander
    Meijer, Sebastiaan
    [J]. 2018 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2018, : 2435 - 2446
  • [38] EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION TYPE 2 RESEARCH
    Haynes, R. Brian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON NUCLEAR WAR AND PLANETARY EMERGENCIES, 44TH SESSION, 2012, : 503 - 511
  • [39] Does evidence-based medicine training improve doctors' knowledge, practice and patient outcomes? A systematic review of the evidence
    Simons, Mary R.
    Zurynski, Yvonne
    Cullis, Jeremy
    Morgan, Michael K.
    Davidson, Andrew S.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (05) : 532 - 538
  • [40] Measures of knowledge and skills for evidence-based practice: A systematic review
    Glegg, Stephanie M. N.
    Holsti, Liisa
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY-REVUE CANADIENNE D ERGOTHERAPIE, 2010, 77 (04): : 219 - 232