Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery

被引:30
|
作者
Brandt, Adam R. [1 ]
Unnasch, Stefan [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Life Cycle Associates LLC, Portola Valley, CA 94028 USA
关键词
LIQUID FUELS;
D O I
10.1021/ef100410f
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) is used worldwide to increase the production of viscous heavy oils. The most common TEOR method injects steam into the subsurface reservoir to reduce the viscosity of the crude oil and allow it to flow. Production of steam for TEOR consumes energy, affecting the energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of oil production. This paper calculates the energy efficiency and GHG emissions of TEOR. Results arc generated for generic cases and for California-specific cases. GHG emissions in the generic cases range from approximate to 105 to 120 g of CO2/MJ [gasoline basis, full fuel cycle, lower heating value (LHV) basis] when co-produced electricity displaces natural-gas-fired combined-cycle electricity. The carbon intensity varies with the energy demand of TEOR, the fuel combusted for steam generation, the amount of electric power co-generated, and the electricity mix. The emission range for co-generation-based TEOR systems is larger (approximate to 70-120 g of CO2/MJ) when coal is displaced from the electricity grid (low) or coal is used for steam generation (high). The emission range for the California-specific cases is similar to that for the generic cases.
引用
收藏
页码:4581 / 4589
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Oil Production in the Eagle Ford Shale
    Yeh, Sonia
    Ghandi, Abbas
    Scanlon, Bridget R.
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Michael Q.
    Vafi, Kourosh
    Reedy, Robert C.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2017, 31 (02) : 1440 - 1449
  • [2] Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Tight Oil Production in the Bakken Formation
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Yeskoo, Tim
    McNally, Michael S.
    Vafi, Kourosh
    Yeh, Sonia
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Michael Q.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (11) : 9613 - 9621
  • [3] Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the recovery and extraction of crude bitumen from Canada's oil sands
    Nimana, Balwinder
    Canter, Christina
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 189 - 199
  • [4] Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and energy recovery from planting street trees
    Chen, Ying-Chu
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (03): : 604 - 612
  • [5] Characterizing Variability in Oil Sands Upgrading Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity
    Pacheco, Diana M.
    Bergerson, Joule A.
    Alvarez-Majmutov, Anton
    Chen, Jinwen
    MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 33 (09) : 8907 - 8919
  • [6] Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel
    de Souza, Simone Pereira
    Pacca, Sergio
    de Avila, Marcio Turra
    Borges, Jose Luiz B.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (11) : 2552 - 2561
  • [7] Thermal oil recovery from fractured reservoirs: Energy and emissions intensities
    Ezeuko, C. C.
    Gates, I. D.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 155 : 29 - 34
  • [8] Analysis of energy use intensity and greenhouse gas emissions for universities in Taiwan
    Wang, Jen Chun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 241
  • [9] Energy balances and greenhouse gas emissions of palm oil biodiesel in Indonesia
    Harsono, Soni Sisbudi
    Prochnow, Annette
    Grundmann, Philipp
    Hansen, Anja
    Hallmann, Claudia
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2012, 4 (02): : 213 - 228
  • [10] Greenhouse gas emissions from MSW incineration in China: Impacts of waste characteristics and energy recovery
    Yang, Na
    Zhang, Hua
    Chen, Miao
    Shao, Li-Ming
    He, Pin-Jing
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (12) : 2552 - 2560