Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Oil Production in the Eagle Ford Shale

被引:10
|
作者
Yeh, Sonia [1 ,2 ]
Ghandi, Abbas [1 ,3 ]
Scanlon, Bridget R. [4 ]
Brandt, Adam R. [5 ]
Cai, Hao [6 ]
Wang, Michael Q. [6 ]
Vafi, Kourosh [5 ]
Reedy, Robert C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Inst Transportat Studies, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Chalmers, Environm & Energy Dept, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] MIT, MIT Joint Program Sci & Policy Global Change, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Bur Econ Geol, Austin, TX 78758 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Argonne Natl Lab, Syst Assessment Grp, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
关键词
WATER-USE; TIGHT OIL; US; MODEL; FUELS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02916
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A rapid increase in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in shale and "tight" formations that began around 2000 has resulted in record increases in oil and natural gas production in the U.S. This study examines energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from crude oil and natural gas produced from similar to 8,200 wells in the Eagle Ford Shale in southern Texas from 2009 to 2013. Our system boundary includes processes from primary exploration wells to the refinery entrance gate (henceforth well-to-refinery or WTR). The Eagle Ford includes four distinct production zones black oil (BO), volatile oil (VO), condensate (C), and dry gas (G) zones with average monthly gas-to-liquids ratios (thousand cubic feet per barrel-Mcf/bbl) varying from 0.91 in the BO zone to 13.9 in the G zone. Total energy consumed in drilling, extracting, processing, and operating an Eagle Ford well is similar to 1.5% of the energy content of the produced crude and gas in the BO and VO zones, compared with 2.2% in the C and G zones. On average, the WTR GHG emissions of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel derived from crude oil produced in the BO and VO zones in the Eagle Ford play are 4.3, 5.0, and 5.1 gCO(2)e/MJ, respectively. Comparing with other known conventional and unconventional crude production where upstream GHG emissions are in the range 5.9-30 gCO(2)e/MJ, oil production in the Eagle Ford has lower WTR GHG emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:1440 / 1449
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Tight Oil Production in the Bakken Formation
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Yeskoo, Tim
    McNally, Michael S.
    Vafi, Kourosh
    Yeh, Sonia
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Michael Q.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (11) : 9613 - 9621
  • [2] Air pollution from unconventional oil and gas development in the Eagle Ford Shale
    Mcpherson, Kristi N.
    Jahn, Leif G.
    Masoud, Catherine G.
    Bhattacharyya, Nirvan
    Modi, Mrinali
    Patel, Kanan
    Abue, Pearl
    Blomdahl, Daniel
    Misztal, Pawel K.
    Ruiz, Lea Hildebrandt
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 338
  • [3] Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Unnasch, Stefan
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2010, 24 (08) : 4581 - 4589
  • [4] Production Decline Curves of Tight Oil Wells in Eagle Ford Shale
    Henrik Wachtmeister
    Linnea Lund
    Kjell Aleklett
    Mikael Höök
    [J]. Natural Resources Research, 2017, 26 : 365 - 377
  • [5] Production Decline Curves of Tight Oil Wells in Eagle Ford Shale
    Wachtmeister, Henrik
    Lund, Linnea
    Aleklett, Kjell
    Hook, Mikael
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (03) : 365 - 377
  • [6] Iterative Bass Model forecasts for unconventional oil production in the Eagle Ford Shale
    Tunstall, Thomas
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 93 : 580 - 588
  • [7] ANALYSIS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM ESTONIAN OIL SHALE BASED ENERGY PRODUCTION PROCESSES. LIFE CYCLE ENERGY ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE
    Siirde, Andres
    Eldermann, Meelis
    Rohumaa, Priit
    Gusca, Julija
    [J]. OIL SHALE, 2013, 30 : 268 - 282
  • [8] Flaring from Unconventional Oil and Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas
    Cushing, Lara J.
    Vavra-Musser, Kate
    Chau, Khang
    Franklin, Meredith
    Johnston, Jill E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 128 (07) : 077003 - 1
  • [9] Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
    O'Sullivan, Francis
    Paltsev, Sergey
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [10] Mitsui joins SM Energy in Eagle Ford shale
    不详
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2011, 109 (14) : 42 - 42