Production Decline Curves of Tight Oil Wells in Eagle Ford Shale

被引:75
|
作者
Wachtmeister, Henrik [1 ]
Lund, Linnea [1 ]
Aleklett, Kjell [1 ]
Hook, Mikael [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Villavagen 16, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Tight oil; Shale oil; Well production; Decline rate; EUR; Eagle Ford;
D O I
10.1007/s11053-016-9323-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study derives typical production curves of tight oil wells based on monthly production data from multiple horizontal Eagle Ford shale oil wells. Well properties initial production (IP) rate and production decline rate were documented, and estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) was calculated using two empirical production decline curve models, the hyperbolic and the stretched exponential function. Individual well productivity, which can be described by IP level, production decline curvature and well lifetime, varies significantly. The average monthly IP was found to be around 500 bbl/day, which yields an EUR in the range of 150-290 kbbl depending on used curve, assumed well lifetime or production cutoff level. More detailed analyses on EUR can be made once longer time series are available. For more realistic modeling of multiple wells a probabilistic approach might be favorable to account for variety in well productivity. For less detailed modeling, for example conceptual regional bottom-up production modeling, the hyperbolic function with deterministic parameters might be preferred because of ease of use, for example with the average parameter values IP = 500 bbl/day, D = 0.3 and b = 1 resulting in an EUR of 250 kbbl with a 30-year well lifetime, however, with the recognition that this extrapolation is uncertain.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 377
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Production Decline Curves of Tight Oil Wells in Eagle Ford Shale
    Henrik Wachtmeister
    Linnea Lund
    Kjell Aleklett
    Mikael Höök
    [J]. Natural Resources Research, 2017, 26 : 365 - 377
  • [2] Production Patterns of Eagle Ford Shale Gas: Decline Curve Analysis Using 1084 Wells
    Guo, Keqiang
    Zhang, Baosheng
    Aleklett, Kjell
    HooK, Mikael
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (10)
  • [3] Data-driven model-based rate decline prediction in unconventional eagle ford shale oil wells
    Bhattacharyya, Subhrajyoti
    Vyas, Aditya
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04) : 401 - 422
  • [4] Iterative Bass Model forecasts for unconventional oil production in the Eagle Ford Shale
    Tunstall, Thomas
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 93 : 580 - 588
  • [5] US expects tight oil production gains from Bakken, Eagle Ford
    Dittrick, Paula
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2012, 110 (09) : 52 - +
  • [6] Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Oil Production in the Eagle Ford Shale
    Yeh, Sonia
    Ghandi, Abbas
    Scanlon, Bridget R.
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Cai, Hao
    Wang, Michael Q.
    Vafi, Kourosh
    Reedy, Robert C.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2017, 31 (02) : 1440 - 1449
  • [7] Characterization of Eagle Ford Shale
    Hsu, SC
    Nelson, PP
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2002, 67 (1-2) : 169 - 183
  • [8] EOG sees Eagle Ford shale as major US oil discovery
    不详
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2010, 108 (14) : 35 - 35
  • [9] Methane and Benzene in Drinking-Water Wells Overlying the Eagle Ford, Fayetteville, and Haynesville Shale Hydrocarbon Production Areas
    McMahon, Peter B.
    Barlow, Jeannie R. B.
    Engle, Mark A.
    Belitz, Kenneth
    Ging, Patricia B.
    Hunt, Andrew G.
    Jurgens, Bryant C.
    Kharaka, Yousif K.
    Tollett, Roland W.
    Kresse, Timothy M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (12) : 6727 - 6734
  • [10] Air pollution from unconventional oil and gas development in the Eagle Ford Shale
    Mcpherson, Kristi N.
    Jahn, Leif G.
    Masoud, Catherine G.
    Bhattacharyya, Nirvan
    Modi, Mrinali
    Patel, Kanan
    Abue, Pearl
    Blomdahl, Daniel
    Misztal, Pawel K.
    Ruiz, Lea Hildebrandt
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 338