Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery

被引:30
|
作者
Brandt, Adam R. [1 ]
Unnasch, Stefan [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Life Cycle Associates LLC, Portola Valley, CA 94028 USA
关键词
LIQUID FUELS;
D O I
10.1021/ef100410f
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) is used worldwide to increase the production of viscous heavy oils. The most common TEOR method injects steam into the subsurface reservoir to reduce the viscosity of the crude oil and allow it to flow. Production of steam for TEOR consumes energy, affecting the energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of oil production. This paper calculates the energy efficiency and GHG emissions of TEOR. Results arc generated for generic cases and for California-specific cases. GHG emissions in the generic cases range from approximate to 105 to 120 g of CO2/MJ [gasoline basis, full fuel cycle, lower heating value (LHV) basis] when co-produced electricity displaces natural-gas-fired combined-cycle electricity. The carbon intensity varies with the energy demand of TEOR, the fuel combusted for steam generation, the amount of electric power co-generated, and the electricity mix. The emission range for co-generation-based TEOR systems is larger (approximate to 70-120 g of CO2/MJ) when coal is displaced from the electricity grid (low) or coal is used for steam generation (high). The emission range for the California-specific cases is similar to that for the generic cases.
引用
收藏
页码:4581 / 4589
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Gas Injection in Shale Reservoirs: Enhanced Oil/Gas Recovery Approaches and Greenhouse Gas Control
    Du, Fengshuang
    Nojabaei, Bahareh
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (12)
  • [22] Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions from transportation of Canadian oil sands to future markets
    Tarnoczi, Tyler
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 107 - 117
  • [23] Greenhouse gas emissions from rapeseed oil ethyl and methyl esters
    Mukhametov, Almas
    Utelbayeva, Akmaral
    [J]. BIOFUELS-UK, 2022, 13 (09): : 1081 - 1086
  • [24] Diurnal variations of the energy intensity and associated greenhouse gas emissions for activated sludge processes
    Emami, Nasir
    Sobhani, Reza
    Rosso, Diego
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 77 (07) : 1838 - 1850
  • [25] Quantitatively evaluating greenhouse gas leakage from CO2 enhanced oil recovery fields
    Chen, Bailian
    Mehana, Mohamed Z.
    Pawar, Rajesh J.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 7 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [26] Land Use Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Conventional Oil Production and Oil Sands
    Yeh, Sonia
    Jordaan, Sarah M.
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Turetsky, Merritt R.
    Spatari, Sabrina
    Keith, David W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (22) : 8766 - 8772
  • [27] Energy performance and greenhouse gas emissions of kelp cultivation for biogas and fertilizer recovery in Sweden
    Pechsiri, Joseph S.
    Thomas, Jean-Baptiste E.
    Risen, Emma
    Ribeiro, Mauricio S.
    Malmstrom, Maria E.
    Nylund, Goran M.
    Jansson, Anette
    Welander, Ulrika
    Pavia, Henrik
    Grondahl, Fredrik
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 573 : 347 - 355
  • [28] Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture, with Particular Emphasis on Emissions from Energy Used
    Golasa, Piotr
    Wysokinski, Marcin
    Bienkowska-Golasa, Wioletta
    Gradziuk, Piotr
    Golonko, Magdalena
    Gradziuk, Barbara
    Siedlecka, Agnieszka
    Gromada, Arkadiusz
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (13)
  • [29] An Ultra-low Emissions Enhanced Thermal Recovery Process for Oil Sands
    Nduagu, E. I.
    Gates, I. D.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 8050 - 8061
  • [30] Energy and greenhouse gas emissions review for Macao
    Li, J. S.
    Chen, G. Q.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 22 : 23 - 32