Correlations between macroseismic intensity estimations and ground motion measures of seismic events

被引:24
|
作者
Masi, Angelo [1 ]
Chiauzzi, Leonardo [2 ]
Nicodemo, Giuseppe [1 ]
Manfredi, Vincenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basilicata, Sch Engn, Potenza, Italy
[2] Chiauzzi Engn Off, Lacedonia, Italy
关键词
Macroseismic intensity; PGA; PGV; Housner intensity; EMS-98; scale; MCS scale; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIOS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; BUILDING STOCK; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-019-00782-2
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Macroseismic intensity data are an important source to learn from historical earthquakes. Nevertheless, this data needs to be converted into more suitable intensity measures to be used in risk analyses, as well as in design practice. To this purpose, in this paper, correlations between macroseismic scales and ground motion parameters have been derived. Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) and Housner Intensity (I-H) as instrumental measures, and European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) and Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg (MCS) as macroseismic measures, have been considered. 179 ground-motion records belonging to 32 earthquake events occurred in Italy in the last 40 years have been selected, provided that for each record, macroseismic intensity in terms of either EMS-98 or MCS or both were also available. Statistical analyses have been carried out to derive both direct (i.e. macroseismic vs instrumental intensity) and inverse (instrumental vs macroseismic intensity) relationships. Results obtained from the proposed relationships have been analyzed and compared with some of the most prominent results available in the technical literature.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1899 / 1932
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationship between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Macroseismic Intensity in Western China
    Du, Ke
    Ding, Baorong
    Luo, Huan
    Sun, Jingjiang
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (01) : 284 - 297
  • [32] Seismic demand analysis using environmental contours of vector-valued ground motion intensity measures
    Rivera-Vargas, Dario
    Heredia-Zavoni, Ernesto
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 265
  • [33] Correlation of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Seismic Damage Indices of Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames
    Mohsen Shahaki Kenari
    Murude Celikag
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2019, 44 : 5131 - 5150
  • [34] Scalar Structure-Specific Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Assessing the Seismic Performance of Structures: A Review
    Kostinakis, Konstantinos
    Fontara, Ioanna-Kleoniki
    Athanatopoulou, Asimina M.
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (04) : 630 - 665
  • [35] Seismic Ground Motion Amplification in a 3D Sedimentary Basin: Source Mechanism and Intensity Measures
    Parla, Rajesh
    Somala, Surendra Nadh
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI, 2022, 16 (04)
  • [36] Modeling spatial correlation of ground motion Intensity Measures for regional seismic hazard and portfolio loss estimation
    Park, J.
    Bazzurrro, P.
    Baker, J.
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, : 579 - 579
  • [37] Comparison and Selection of Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Seismic Design of Super High-Rise Buildings
    Lu, Xiao
    Lu, Xinzheng
    Guan, Hong
    Ye, Lieping
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 16 (07) : 1249 - 1262
  • [38] Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Rocking Building Systems
    Shokrabadi, Mehrdad
    Burton, Henry V.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2017, 33 (04) : 1533 - 1554
  • [39] Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Steel Storage Tanks With Unanchored Support Conditions
    Phan, Hoang Nam
    Paolacci, Fabrizio
    Nguyen, Van My
    Hoang, Phuong Hoa
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (06):
  • [40] Correlation of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Seismic Damage Indices of Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames
    Kenari, Mohsen Shahaki
    Celikag, Murude
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 44 (05) : 5131 - 5150