Use of Macroseismic Intensity Data to Validate a Regionally Adjustable Ground Motion Prediction Model

被引:8
|
作者
Tang, Yuxiang [1 ]
Lam, Nelson [1 ,2 ]
Tsang, Hing-Ho [2 ,3 ]
Lumantarna, Elisa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Bushfire & Nat Hazards Cooperat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Sustainable Infrastruct, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
关键词
seismic hazard; attenuation; GMPE; crustal model; MMI; intraplate region; MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY; EMPIRICAL ATTENUATION; HORIZONTAL COMPONENT; SPECTRAL AMPLITUDES; M-W; VELOCITY; EARTHQUAKE; ROCK; LIQUEFACTION; SIMULATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/geosciences9100422
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In low-to-moderate seismicity (intraplate) regions where locally recorded strong motion data are too scare for conventional regression analysis, stochastic simulations based on seismological modelling have often been used to predict ground motions of future earthquakes. This modelling methodology has been practised in Central and Eastern North America (CENA) for decades. It is cautioned that ground motion prediction equations (GMPE) that have been developed for use in CENA might not always be suited for use in another intraplate region because of differences in the crustal structure. This paper introduces a regionally adjustable GMPE, known as the component attenuation model (CAM), by which a diversity of crustal conditions can be covered in one model. Input parameters into CAM have been configured in the same manner as a seismological model, as both types of models are based on decoupling the spectral properties of earthquake ground motions into a generic source factor and a regionally specific path factor (including anelastic and geometric attenuation factors) along with a crustal factor. Unlike seismological modelling, CAM is essentially a GMPE that can be adapted readily for use in different regions (or different areas within a region) without the need of undertaking any stochastic simulations, providing that parameters characterising the crustal structure have been identified. In addressing the challenge of validating a GMPE for use in an area where instrumental data are scarce, modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) data inferred from peak ground velocity values predicted by CAM are compared with records of MMI of past earthquake events, as reported in historical archives. South-Eastern Australia (SEA) and South-Eastern China (SEC) are the two study regions used in this article for demonstrating the viability of CAM as a ground motion prediction tool in an intraplate environment.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analytical solution for the Bayesian estimation of ground motion from macroseismic intensity data
    Ordaz, Mario
    Fiorini, Emilia
    Bazzurro, Paolo
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (07) : 2633 - 2640
  • [2] An analytical solution for the Bayesian estimation of ground motion from macroseismic intensity data
    Mario Ordaz
    Emilia Fiorini
    Paolo Bazzurro
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16 : 2633 - 2640
  • [3] Relationships between ground motion parameters and macroseismic intensity for Italy
    Gomez-Capera, Augusto Antonio
    D'Amico, Maria
    Lanzano, Giovanni
    Locati, Mario
    Santulin, Marco
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (11) : 5143 - 5164
  • [4] Relationships between ground motion parameters and macroseismic intensity for Italy
    Augusto Antonio Gomez-Capera
    Maria D’Amico
    Giovanni Lanzano
    Mario Locati
    Marco Santulin
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18 : 5143 - 5164
  • [5] Correlations between macroseismic intensity estimations and ground motion measures of seismic events
    Angelo Masi
    Leonardo Chiauzzi
    Giuseppe Nicodemo
    Vincenzo Manfredi
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18 : 1899 - 1932
  • [6] Correlations between macroseismic intensity estimations and ground motion measures of seismic events
    Masi, Angelo
    Chiauzzi, Leonardo
    Nicodemo, Giuseppe
    Manfredi, Vincenzo
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (05) : 1899 - 1932
  • [7] A real-time prediction model for macroseismic intensity in China
    Xu Weixiao
    Yang Weisong
    Yu Dehu
    [J]. Journal of Seismology, 2021, 25 : 235 - 253
  • [8] A real-time prediction model for macroseismic intensity in China
    Xu Weixiao
    Yang Weisong
    Yu Dehu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2021, 25 (01) : 235 - 253
  • [9] CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MACROSEISMIC INTENSITY VALUES AND GROUND MOTION MEASURES OF VRANCEA (ROMANIA) SUBCRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES
    Constantin, A. P.
    Moldovan, I. A.
    Partheniu, R.
    Grecu, B.
    Ionescu, C.
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2021, 66 (5-6):
  • [10] New reversible relationships between ground motion parameters and macroseismic intensity for Italy and their application in ShakeMap
    Oliveti, Ilaria
    Faenza, Licia
    Michelini, Alberto
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 231 (02) : 1117 - 1137