The social inefficiency of regulating indirect land use change due to biofuels

被引:18
|
作者
Khanna, Madhu [1 ]
Wang, Weiwei [2 ]
Hudiburg, Tara W. [3 ]
DeLucia, Evan H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Inst Sustainabil Energy & Environm, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, Dept Forest Rangeland & Fire Sci, 875 Perimeter Dr, Moscow, ID 83863 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Plant Biol, Inst Sustainabil Energy & Environm, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2017年 / 8卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DAYCENT ECOSYSTEM MODEL; CARBON; ETHANOL; POLICY; FUEL; MANAGEMENT; CROPLANDS; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1038/ncomms15513
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Efforts to reduce the indirect land use change (ILUC) -related carbon emissions caused by biofuels has led to inclusion of an ILUC factor as a part of the carbon intensity of biofuels in a Low Carbon Fuel Standard. While previous research has provided varying estimates of this ILUC factor, there has been no research examining the economic effects and additional carbon savings from including this factor in implementing a Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Here we show that inclusion of an ILUC factor in a national Low Carbon Fuel Standard led to additional abatement of cumulative emissions over 2007-2027 by 1.3 to 2.6% (0.6-1.1 billion mega-grams carbon-dioxide-equivalent (Mg CO(2)e(-1)) compared to those without an ILUC factor, depending on the ILUC factors utilized. The welfare cost to the US of this additional abatement ranged from $61 to $187 Mg CO(2)e(-1) and was substantially greater than the social cost of carbon of $50 Mg CO(2)e(-1).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of considering land intensification and updated data on biofuels land use change and emissions estimates
    Taheripour, Farzad
    Zhao, Xin
    Tyner, Wallace E.
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
  • [42] The impact of considering land intensification and updated data on biofuels land use change and emissions estimates
    Farzad Taheripour
    Xin Zhao
    Wallace E. Tyner
    [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 10
  • [43] Response to "how robust are reductions in modeled estimates from GTAP-BIO of the indirect land use change induced by conventional biofuels?"
    Taheripour, F.
    Mueller, S.
    Kwon, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 310
  • [44] Europe debates the impact of indirect land-use change
    不详
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (01): : 5 - 5
  • [45] Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon
    Arima, Eugenio Y.
    Richards, Peter
    Walker, Robert
    Caldas, Marcellus M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 6 (02):
  • [46] PREVENTION OF INDIRECT LAND USE CHANGE: POLICY AND GOVERNANCE OPTIONS
    Wicke, B.
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 1596 - 1598
  • [47] Biofuels, Land Use Change, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Some Unexplored Variables
    Kim, Hyungtae
    Kim, Seungdo
    Dale, Bruce E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (03) : 961 - 967
  • [48] Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil
    Lapola, David M.
    Schaldach, Ruediger
    Alcamo, Joseph
    Bondeau, Alberte
    Koch, Jennifer
    Koelking, Christina
    Priess, Joerg A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (08) : 3388 - 3393
  • [49] Looking beyond calculative spaces of biofuels: Onto-topologies of indirect land use changes
    Humalisto, Niko Heikki
    Joronen, Mikko
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2013, 50 : 182 - 190
  • [50] Why the Debate about Land Use Change Should Not Only Focus on Biofuels
    Gorissen, Leen
    Buytaert, Veerle
    Cuypers, Dieter
    Dauwe, Tom
    Pelkmans, Luc
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (11) : 4046 - 4049