The social inefficiency of regulating indirect land use change due to biofuels

被引:18
|
作者
Khanna, Madhu [1 ]
Wang, Weiwei [2 ]
Hudiburg, Tara W. [3 ]
DeLucia, Evan H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Inst Sustainabil Energy & Environm, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, Dept Forest Rangeland & Fire Sci, 875 Perimeter Dr, Moscow, ID 83863 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Plant Biol, Inst Sustainabil Energy & Environm, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
来源
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2017年 / 8卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DAYCENT ECOSYSTEM MODEL; CARBON; ETHANOL; POLICY; FUEL; MANAGEMENT; CROPLANDS; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1038/ncomms15513
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Efforts to reduce the indirect land use change (ILUC) -related carbon emissions caused by biofuels has led to inclusion of an ILUC factor as a part of the carbon intensity of biofuels in a Low Carbon Fuel Standard. While previous research has provided varying estimates of this ILUC factor, there has been no research examining the economic effects and additional carbon savings from including this factor in implementing a Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Here we show that inclusion of an ILUC factor in a national Low Carbon Fuel Standard led to additional abatement of cumulative emissions over 2007-2027 by 1.3 to 2.6% (0.6-1.1 billion mega-grams carbon-dioxide-equivalent (Mg CO(2)e(-1)) compared to those without an ILUC factor, depending on the ILUC factors utilized. The welfare cost to the US of this additional abatement ranged from $61 to $187 Mg CO(2)e(-1) and was substantially greater than the social cost of carbon of $50 Mg CO(2)e(-1).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Land use change in a biofuels hotspot: The case of Iowa, USA
    Secchi, Silvia
    Kurkalova, Lyubov
    Gassman, Philip W.
    Hart, Chad
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (06): : 2391 - 2400
  • [22] The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land use change
    Lange, Mareike
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2373 - 2385
  • [23] Biofuels Induced Land Use Change Emissions: The Role of Implemented Land Use Emission Factors
    Taheripour, Farzad
    Mueller, Steffen
    Emery, Isaac
    Karami, Omid
    Sajedinia, Ehsanreza
    Zhuang, Qianlai
    Wang, Michael
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [24] Geography Matters: International Trade Patterns and the Indirect Land Use Effects of Biofuels
    Villoria, Nelson B.
    Hertel, Thomas W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 93 (04) : 919 - 935
  • [25] Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science
    Liska, Adam J.
    Perrin, Richard K.
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2009, 3 (03): : 318 - 328
  • [26] Regulating carbon emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC): US and California case studies
    Breetz, Hanna L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2017, 77 : 25 - 31
  • [27] Estimating indirect allocative inefficiency and productivity change
    Fukuyama, H.
    Weber, W. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2009, 60 (11) : 1594 - 1608
  • [28] Indirect land-use change under scrutiny
    不详
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2011, 5 (02): : 117 - 117
  • [29] The EU, the WTO and Indirect Land-Use Change
    Lydgate, Emily Barrett
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2013, 47 (01) : 159 - 186
  • [30] Indirect land use change - Help beyond the hype?
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 62 : 218 - 221