Quantifying the effect of measurement errors on the uncertainty in bilinear model predictions: a small simulation study

被引:13
|
作者
Faber, NM [1 ]
机构
[1] ATO, Dept Prod & Control Syst, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
bilinear calibration; error estimation; Monte Carlo simulation; resampling; bootstrap; jack-knife;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00872-8
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Four methods are compared for quantifying the effect of measurement errors on the uncertainty in bilinear model predictions. These methods amount to (1) evaluating an approximate expression for prediction variance, (2) bootstrapping residuals left after fitting the data matrices using a singular value decomposition, (3) adding noise from an appropriate distribution to the original data, and (4) jack-knifing rows and columns of the data matrices. The comparison is carried out for liquid chromatography/ultraviolet data obtained from Malinowski and the models are constructed using the generalized rank annihilation method. It is found that the first three methods give highly consistent results, whereas the jack-knife yields uncertainty estimates that have no clear interpretation. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 201
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QUANTIFYING MODEL UNCERTAINTY USING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY STANDARDS
    Du, Xiaoping
    Shah, Harsheel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 5, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 1161 - 1167
  • [2] Quantifying uncertainty in crop model predictions due to the uncertainty in the observations used for calibration
    Confalonieri, Roberto
    Bregaglio, Simone
    Acutis, Marco
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 328 : 72 - 77
  • [3] Effect of Rainfall Measurement Errors on Nonpoint-Source Pollution Model Uncertainty
    Shen, Z. Y.
    Chen, L.
    Liao, Q.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 26 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [4] Towards Quantifying the Effect of Material Uncertainty on RCS Predictions of Composite Targets
    Kelley, Jon T.
    Mackie-Mason, Brian
    Chamulak, David A.
    Martin, Mark
    Crouch, Kendall
    Courtney, Clifton C.
    Yilmaz, Ali E.
    [J]. 2024 INTERNATIONAL APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY SYMPOSIUM, ACES 2024, 2024,
  • [5] A Bayesian joint probability post-processor for reducing errors and quantifying uncertainty in monthly streamflow predictions
    Pokhrel, P.
    Robertson, D. E.
    Wang, Q. J.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (02) : 795 - 804
  • [6] Quantifying the sources of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions of insect disturbances in an uncertain climate
    David R. Gray
    [J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2017, 74
  • [7] Quantifying the sources of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions of insect disturbances in an uncertain climate
    Gray, David R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2017, 74 (03)
  • [8] Quantifying uncertainty for predictions with model error in non-Gaussian systems with intermittency
    Branicki, Michal
    Majda, Andrew J.
    [J]. NONLINEARITY, 2012, 25 (09) : 2543 - 2578
  • [9] Quantifying Uncertainty in Model Predictions for the Pliocene (Plio-QUMP): Initial results
    Pope, James O.
    Collins, Matthew
    Haywood, Alan M.
    Dowsett, Harry J.
    Hunter, Stephen J.
    Lunt, Daniel J.
    Pickering, Steven J.
    Pound, Matthew J.
    [J]. PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY, 2011, 309 (1-2) : 128 - 140
  • [10] Reducing measurement errors and measurement uncertainty in PQ. A case study
    Stanciu, Niculai
    Stanescu, Dorel
    Dobre, Ion
    Postolache, Petru
    [J]. 2014 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONICS AND QUALITY OF POWER (ICHQP), 2014, : 546 - 550