Quantifying the sources of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions of insect disturbances in an uncertain climate

被引:5
|
作者
Gray, David R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, Atlantic Forestry Ctr, POB 4000, Fredericton, NB E3B 5P7, Canada
关键词
Decision making; Ecosystem good and services; Pest management; Forest planning; Spruce budworm; Insect outbreak projections; SPRUCE BUDWORM DEFOLIATION; OUTBREAK CHARACTERISTICS; NORTH-AMERICA; PATTERNS; FORESTS; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1007/s13595-017-0645-y
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Key message Natural disturbance can disrupt the anticipated delivery of forest-related ecosystem goods and services. Model predictions of natural disturbances have substantial uncertainties arising from the choices of input data and spatial scale used in the model building process, and the uncertainty of future climate conditions which are a major driver of disturbances. Quantifying the multiple contributions to uncertainty will aid decision making and guide future research needs. Context Forest management planning has been able, in the past, to rely on substantial empirical evidence regarding tree growth, succession, frequency and impacts of natural disturbances to estimate the future delivery of goods and services. Uncertainty has not been thought large enough to warrant consideration. Our rapidly changing climate is casting that empirical knowledge in doubt. Aims This paper describes how models of future spruce budworm outbreaks are plagued by uncertainty contributed by (among others): selection of data used in the model building process; model error; and uncertainty of the future climate and forest that will drive the future insect outbreak. The contribution of each to the total uncertainty will be quantified. Methods Outbreak models are built by the multivariate technique of reduced rank regression using different datasets. Each model and an estimate of its error are then used to predict future outbreaks under different future conditions of climate and forest composition. Variation in predictions is calculated, and the variance is apportioned among the model components that contributed to the epistemic uncertainty in predictions. Results Projections of future outbreaks are highly uncertain under the range of input data and future conditions examined. Uncertainty is not uniformly distributed spatially; the average 75% confidence interval for outbreak duration is 10 years. Estimates of forest inventory for model building and choice of climate scenario for projections of future climate had the greatest contributions to predictions of outbreak duration and severity. Conclusion Predictions of future spruce budworm outbreaks are highly uncertain. More precise outbreak data with which to build a new outbreak model will have the biggest impact on reducing uncertainty. However, an uncertain future climate will continue to produce uncertainty in outbreak projections. Forest management strategies must, therefore, include alternatives that present a reasonable likelihood of achieving acceptable outcomes over a wide range of future conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Quantifying the sources of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions of insect disturbances in an uncertain climate
    David R. Gray
    [J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2017, 74
  • [2] Quantifying Sources of Uncertainty in Projections of Future Climate
    Northrop, Paul J.
    Chandler, Richard E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (23) : 8793 - 8808
  • [3] Quantifying the sources of uncertainty in upper air climate variables
    Eghdamirad, Sajjad
    Johnson, Fiona
    Woldemeskel, Fitsum
    Sharma, Ashish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (08) : 3859 - 3874
  • [4] Bayesian Approach to Quantifying Epistemic Uncertainty in a Processor Availability Model
    Everline, Chester J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2012, 49 (06) : 1019 - 1031
  • [5] Quantifying uncertainty in crop model predictions due to the uncertainty in the observations used for calibration
    Confalonieri, Roberto
    Bregaglio, Simone
    Acutis, Marco
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 328 : 72 - 77
  • [6] Quantifying the sources of uncertainty in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections
    Aryal, Anil
    Shrestha, Sangam
    Babel, Mukand S.
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2019, 135 (1-2) : 193 - 209
  • [7] Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections
    Bosshard, T.
    Carambia, M.
    Goergen, K.
    Kotlarski, S.
    Krahe, P.
    Zappa, M.
    Schaer, C.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (03) : 1523 - 1536
  • [8] Quantifying the sources of uncertainty in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections
    Anil Aryal
    Sangam Shrestha
    Mukand S. Babel
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2019, 135 : 193 - 209
  • [9] Quantifying Uncertainty Due to Climate Variability in Vehicle-Integrated Photovoltaic Yield Predictions
    Golubev, Timofey
    [J]. 2023 IEEE 50TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE, PVSC, 2023,
  • [10] Quantifying sources of climate uncertainty to inform risk analysis for climate change decision-making
    Ylhaisi, Jussi S.
    Garre, Luca
    Daron, Joseph
    Raisanen, Jouni
    [J]. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 20 (07) : 811 - 835