Quantifying the effect of measurement errors on the uncertainty in bilinear model predictions: a small simulation study

被引:13
|
作者
Faber, NM [1 ]
机构
[1] ATO, Dept Prod & Control Syst, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
bilinear calibration; error estimation; Monte Carlo simulation; resampling; bootstrap; jack-knife;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00872-8
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Four methods are compared for quantifying the effect of measurement errors on the uncertainty in bilinear model predictions. These methods amount to (1) evaluating an approximate expression for prediction variance, (2) bootstrapping residuals left after fitting the data matrices using a singular value decomposition, (3) adding noise from an appropriate distribution to the original data, and (4) jack-knifing rows and columns of the data matrices. The comparison is carried out for liquid chromatography/ultraviolet data obtained from Malinowski and the models are constructed using the generalized rank annihilation method. It is found that the first three methods give highly consistent results, whereas the jack-knife yields uncertainty estimates that have no clear interpretation. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 201
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the uncertainty of groundwater model predictions associated with conceptual errors: A per-datum approach to model calibration
    Gaganis, P
    Smith, L
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (04) : 503 - 514
  • [22] Quantifying atrial anatomy uncertainty from clinical data and its impact on electro-physiology simulation predictions
    Corrado, Cesare
    Razeghi, Orod
    Roney, Caroline
    Coveney, Sam
    Williams, Steven
    Sim, Iain
    O'Neill, Mark
    Wilkinson, Richard
    Oakley, Jeremy
    Clayton, Richard H.
    Niederer, Steven
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2020, 61
  • [23] Stochastic modelling of model errors: A simulation study
    Tsyrulnikov, M. D.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 131 (613) : 3345 - 3371
  • [24] Study on verification of measurement uncertainty by computer simulation and experiment
    Zhu, JM
    Wang, ZY
    Xia, XT
    Li, P
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 5253 : 296 - 302
  • [25] THE EFFECT OF IGNORING SMALL MEASUREMENT ERRORS IN PRECISION INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION
    CARROLL, RJ
    SPIEGELMAN, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 18 (03) : 170 - 173
  • [26] SMALL-SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF PREDICTIONS FROM THE REGRESSION-MODEL WITH AUTOREGRESSIVE ERRORS
    SPITZER, JJ
    BAILLIE, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 78 (382) : 258 - 263
  • [27] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SIMULATION AND TIME SERIES MODEL IN QUANTIFYING BULLWHIP EFFECT IN SUPPLY CHAIN
    Oyatoye, Emmanuel Olateju
    Fabson, T. V. O.
    [J]. SERBIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 6 (02) : 145 - 154
  • [28] QUANTIFYING THE UNCERTAINTY OF PILLAR SAFETY FACTOR BY MONTE CARLO SIMULATION - A CASE STUDY
    Ghasemi, E.
    Shahriar, K.
    Sharifzadeh, M.
    Hashemolhosseini, H.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MINING SCIENCES, 2010, 55 (03) : 623 - 635
  • [29] Small sample uncertainty aspects in relation to bullwhip effect measurement
    Nielsen, Erland Hejn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2013, 146 (02) : 543 - 549
  • [30] A two-dimensional simulation technique for quantifying the uncertainty of a combined travel demand model
    Chen, A
    Pravinvongvuth, S
    Chootinan, P
    [J]. ISUMA 2003: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNCERTAINTY MODELING AND ANALYSIS, 2003, : 367 - 372