Consumers' Views of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Information

被引:57
|
作者
McBride, Colleen M. [1 ]
Wade, Christopher H. [1 ]
Kaphingst, Kimberly A. [2 ]
机构
[1] NHGRI, Social & Behav Res Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Hlth Commun Res Lab, St Louis, MO 63112 USA
关键词
genetic testing; health communication; genetic competency; translational research; decision making; health behavior; NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL-CANCER; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; BREAST-OVARIAN CANCER; UNITED-STATES; SCREENING PRACTICES; MARKETING CAMPAIGN; RISK COMMUNICATION; ALZHEIMER-DISEASE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; SUSCEPTIBILITY;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141604
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In this report, we describe the evolution and types of genetic information provided directly to consumers, discuss potential advantages and disadvantages of these products, and review research evaluating consumer responses to direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. The available evidence to date has focused on predictive tests and does not suggest that individuals, health care providers, or health care systems have been harmed by a DTC provision of genetic information. An understanding of consumer responses to susceptibility tests has lagged behind. The Multiplex Initiative is presented as a case study of research to understand consumers' responses to DTC susceptibility tests. Three priority areas are recommended for accelerated research activities to inform public policy regarding DTC genetic information: (a) exploring consumer's long-term responses to DTC genetic testing on a comprehensive set of outcomes, (b) evaluating optimal services to support decision making about genetic testing, and (c) evaluating best practices in promoting genetic competencies among health providers.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 446
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Interdisciplinary Crossroads
    Stein, Richard A.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (01) : 35 - 67
  • [32] Response to 'Europe and direct-to-consumer genetic tests'
    Kricka, Larry J.
    Fortina, Paolo
    Mai, Yuan
    Patrinos, George P.
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2012, 13 (02) : 146 - 146
  • [33] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a bibliometric analysis
    Xavier, Bracke
    McVeigh, T. P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 2) : 73 - 73
  • [34] User Attitudes On Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Saha, Debjani
    Chan, Anna
    Stacy, Brook
    Javkar, Kiran
    Patkar, Sushant
    Mazurek, Michelle L.
    2020 5TH IEEE EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (EUROS&P 2020), 2020, : 120 - 138
  • [35] Predictors of interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Sweeny, Kate
    Legg, Angela M.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (10) : 1259 - 1272
  • [36] FDA To Regulate Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests
    Brower, Vicki
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (21) : 1610 - +
  • [37] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review
    Jiang, Sharon
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Lebo, David
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2023, 57 (6) : 1190 - 1198
  • [38] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests and the Right to Know
    Sandroff, Ronni
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2010, 40 (05) : 24 - 25
  • [39] The epistemic harms of direct-to-consumer genetic tests
    Haddad, Yasmin
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 26 (04) : 559 - 571
  • [40] Europe to ban direct-to-consumer genetic tests?
    Pascal Borry
    Nature Biotechnology, 2008, 26 : 736 - 737