Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps After Incomplete Resection

被引:32
|
作者
Pohl, Heiko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anderson, Joseph C. [1 ,3 ]
Aguilera-Fish, Andres [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Calderwood, Audrey H. [2 ,3 ]
Mackenzie, Todd A. [4 ]
Robertson, Douglas J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Hanover, NH 03766 USA
[3] Dartmouth Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Inst, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; POLYPECTOMY; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINE; RATES;
D O I
10.7326/M20-6689
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Incomplete resection of neoplastic polyps is considered an important reason for the development of colorectal cancer. However, there are no data on the natural history of polyps that were incompletely removed. Objective: To examine the risk for metachronous neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy after documented incomplete polyp resection. Design: Observational cohort study of patients who participated in the CARE (Complete Adenoma REsection) study (2009 to 2012). Setting: 2 academic medical centers. Patients: Patients who had resection of a 5- to 20-mm neoplastic polyp, had a documented complete or incomplete resection, and had a surveillance examination. Measurements: Segment metachronous neoplasia, defined as the proportion of colon segments with at least 1 neoplastic polyp at first surveillance examination, was measured. Segment metachronous neoplasia was compared between segments with a prior incomplete polyp resection (incomplete segments) and those with a prior complete resection (complete segments), accounting for clustering of segments within patients. Results: Of 233 participants in the original study, 166 (71%) had at least 1 surveillance examination. Median time to surveillance was shorter after incomplete versus complete resection (median, 17 vs. 45 months). The risk for any metachronous neoplasia was greater in segments with incomplete versus complete resection (52% vs. 23%; risk difference [RD], 28% [95% CI, 9% to 47%]; P = 0.004). Incomplete segments also had a greater number of neoplastic polyps (mean, 0.8 vs. 0.3; RD, 0.50 [CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = 0.008) and greater risk for advanced neoplasia (18% vs. 3%; RD, 15% [CI, 1% to 29%]; P = 0.034). Incomplete resection was the strongest independent factor associated with metachronous neoplasia (odds ratio, 3.0 [CI, 1.12 to 8.17]). Limitation: Potential patient selection bias due to incomplete follow-up. Conclusion: This natural history study found a statistically significantly greater risk for future neoplasia and advanced neoplasia in colon segments after incomplete resection compared with segments with complete resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevalence of diverse colorectal polyps and risk factors for colorectal carcinoma in situ and neoplastic polyps
    Li, Xiaojuan
    Hu, Mengting
    Wang, Zhangjun
    Liu, Mei
    Chen, Ying
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [42] Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors
    Kinichi Hotta
    Takahiro Fujii
    Yutaka Saito
    Takahisa Matsuda
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24
  • [43] Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer
    Won Beom Jung
    Chang Sik Yu
    Seok Byung Lim
    In Ja Park
    Yong Sik Yoon
    Jin Cheon Kim
    World Journal of Surgery, 2017, 41 : 285 - 294
  • [44] RECURRENCE AFTER RESECTION OF HEPATIC METASTASES IN COLORECTAL CANCERS
    DUCERF, C
    MALAISE, J
    CAILLON, P
    MARGOTTON, J
    BAULIEUX, J
    POUYET, M
    LYON CHIRURGICAL, 1991, 87 (06) : 426 - 428
  • [45] Factors Predicting Malignant Occurrence and Polyp Recurrence after the Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps: A Single Center Experience
    Mandic, Olga
    Jovanovic, Igor
    Cvetkovic, Mirjana
    Maksimovic, Jasmina
    Radonjic, Tijana
    Popovic, Maja
    Nikolic, Novica
    Brankovic, Marija
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (10):
  • [46] Risk Factors for Recurrence Following Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps in a Western Population
    Emmanuel, Andrew
    Gulati, Shraddha
    Hayee, Bu
    Haji, Amyn
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB432 - AB432
  • [47] RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL POLYPS IN A WESTERN POPULATION
    Emmanuel, A.
    Gulati, S.
    Burt, M.
    Hayee, B.
    Haji, A.
    GUT, 2016, 65 : A54 - A54
  • [48] PREDICTORS OF RECURRENCE IN COMPLEX COLORECTAL POLYPS AT RESECTION: A UK TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Hossain, Ejaz
    Thayalasekaran, Sreedhari
    Alkandari, Asma A.
    Varytimiadis, Lazaros
    Arndtz, Sophie
    Abdelrahim, Mohamed
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB379 - AB379
  • [49] PREVALENCE OF RESIDUAL NEOPLASTIC TISSUE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF COLONIC NEOPLASTIC POLYPS: CORRELATION WITH THE SURGICAL SPECIMEN.
    Bun, M.
    Pereira, L.
    Grzona, E.
    Canelas, A.
    Laporte, M.
    Peczan, C.
    Cimmino, D.
    Rotholtz, N.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (04) : E233 - E233
  • [50] INCOMPLETE RESECTION OF 4-20 MM COLORECTAL POLYPS WHEN USING COLD SNARE
    von Renteln, Daniel
    Benard, Florence
    Barkun, Alan N.
    Bouin, Mickael
    Bouchard, Simon
    Deslandres, Erik
    Panzini, Benoit
    Weber, Audrey
    Sidani, Sacha
    Leduc, Raymond
    Pohl, Heiko
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB440 - AB440