Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps After Incomplete Resection

被引:32
|
作者
Pohl, Heiko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anderson, Joseph C. [1 ,3 ]
Aguilera-Fish, Andres [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Calderwood, Audrey H. [2 ,3 ]
Mackenzie, Todd A. [4 ]
Robertson, Douglas J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Hanover, NH 03766 USA
[3] Dartmouth Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Inst, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; POLYPECTOMY; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINE; RATES;
D O I
10.7326/M20-6689
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Incomplete resection of neoplastic polyps is considered an important reason for the development of colorectal cancer. However, there are no data on the natural history of polyps that were incompletely removed. Objective: To examine the risk for metachronous neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy after documented incomplete polyp resection. Design: Observational cohort study of patients who participated in the CARE (Complete Adenoma REsection) study (2009 to 2012). Setting: 2 academic medical centers. Patients: Patients who had resection of a 5- to 20-mm neoplastic polyp, had a documented complete or incomplete resection, and had a surveillance examination. Measurements: Segment metachronous neoplasia, defined as the proportion of colon segments with at least 1 neoplastic polyp at first surveillance examination, was measured. Segment metachronous neoplasia was compared between segments with a prior incomplete polyp resection (incomplete segments) and those with a prior complete resection (complete segments), accounting for clustering of segments within patients. Results: Of 233 participants in the original study, 166 (71%) had at least 1 surveillance examination. Median time to surveillance was shorter after incomplete versus complete resection (median, 17 vs. 45 months). The risk for any metachronous neoplasia was greater in segments with incomplete versus complete resection (52% vs. 23%; risk difference [RD], 28% [95% CI, 9% to 47%]; P = 0.004). Incomplete segments also had a greater number of neoplastic polyps (mean, 0.8 vs. 0.3; RD, 0.50 [CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = 0.008) and greater risk for advanced neoplasia (18% vs. 3%; RD, 15% [CI, 1% to 29%]; P = 0.034). Incomplete resection was the strongest independent factor associated with metachronous neoplasia (odds ratio, 3.0 [CI, 1.12 to 8.17]). Limitation: Potential patient selection bias due to incomplete follow-up. Conclusion: This natural history study found a statistically significantly greater risk for future neoplasia and advanced neoplasia in colon segments after incomplete resection compared with segments with complete resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surveillance recommendations after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps
    Merino, Luisa Adan
    Soler, Ana Maria Mora
    Diaz, angel Ponferrada
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2024, 163 (03): : 143 - 148
  • [22] The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps
    Bensen, S
    Mott, LA
    Dain, B
    Rothstein, R
    Baron, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 94 (01): : 194 - 199
  • [23] The Analysis of Recurrence Rate After Colorectal Emr: Is Incomplete Polyp Resection Really a Clinical Important Problem?
    Arimoto, Jun
    Higurashi, Takuma
    Fuyuki, Akiko
    Ohkubo, Hidenori
    Nonaka, Takashi
    Nakajima, Atsushi
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB383 - AB384
  • [24] Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Prospective Evaluation of Recurrence and Complications of Large Colorectal Polyps
    German, Andres
    Herrera Najum, Pablo
    Bernardi, Gustavo
    Sambuelli, Gabriela
    Rodriguez, Pablo C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB386 - AB386
  • [25] Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps : prospective evaluation of recurrence and complications
    Carvalho, Rita
    Areia, Miguel
    Brito, Daniel
    Saraiva, Sandra
    Alves, Susana
    Cadime, Ana Teresa
    ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2013, 76 (02) : 225 - 230
  • [26] A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy
    Ma, Xianzong
    Feng, Xiutang
    Li, Yangjie
    Du, Yongqiang
    Wang, Jiheng
    Wu, Yanmei
    Jin, Hua
    Xie, Xiaoli
    Wang, Xin
    Jin, Peng
    Yang, Lang
    Wang, Haihong
    Leung, Joseph
    Sheng, Jianqiu
    He, Yuqi
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (05) : 1163 - 1170
  • [27] RECURRENCE RATES FOR COLORECTAL POLYPS
    NEUGUT, AI
    JOHNSEN, CM
    FORDE, KA
    TREAT, MR
    CANCER, 1985, 55 (07) : 1586 - 1589
  • [28] The risk factors of the recurrence of colorectal adenomatous polyps after polypectomy
    Kim, JJ
    Sung, I
    Son, HJ
    Chun, JH
    Rhee, PL
    Koh, KC
    Paik, SW
    Rhee, JC
    Choi, KW
    Kim, SW
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (04) : A437 - A437
  • [29] Prevalence of Residual Neoplastic Tissue After Endoscopic Resection of Colonic Neoplastic Polyps: Correlation With the Surgical Specimen
    Pereyra, Lisandro
    Bun, Maximiliano
    Luna, Pablo
    Medrano, Mario A.
    Mella, Jose M.
    Fischer, Carolina
    Nicolas Panigadi, Guillermo
    Gonzalez, Raquel
    Casas, Gabriel
    Pedreira, Silvia C.
    Cimmino, Daniel G.
    Boerr, Luis A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 424 - 424
  • [30] Watchful waiting versus colorectal resection after polypectomy for malignant colorectal polyps
    Levic, Katarina
    Kjaer, Monica
    Bulut, Orhan
    Jess, Per
    Bisgaard, Thue
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 62 (01):