Effect of glyphosate application timings and methods on glyphosate-resistant cotton

被引:17
|
作者
Viator, RP [1 ]
Jost, PH
Senseman, SA
Cothren, JT
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Georgia Cooperat Extens Serv, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
herbicide resistant; transgenic crops;
D O I
10.1614/P2002-025
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Under certain conditions, application of glyphosate to glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton can lead to fruit shedding and yield reductions. Field studies were conducted at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station using GR cotton, cv. 'DeltaPine 5690RR', to determine if application method and timing affect cotton fruit retention. Glyphosate at 1.12 kg ai ha(-1) was precisely postdirected (PD), postdirected with 25% foliage coverage (PDFC), or applied over the top (OT) at the 8- or 18-leaf stage after an initial topical application of 1.12 kg ha(-1) glyphosate at the four-leaf stage. In one of the years of this study, 8 PD, 18 PDFQ and 18 OT reduced yield. In 1999 and 2000, 8 PDFC and 8 OT applications of glyphosate caused yield loss, mainly due to lower mean boll weight. Glyphosate applied topically at the eight-leaf stage also affected the Position 1 boll retention throughout the plant in both years. Glyphosate contact with leaves and stems should be avoided when applying glyphosate after the four-leaf stage to prevent possible yield loss.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 151
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Interference in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean
    Lee, Donna
    Miller, Donnie
    Blouin, David
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2009, 13 (02): : 174 - 177
  • [2] Glyphosate-resistant corn interference in glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Thomas, Walter E.
    Everman, Wesley J.
    Clewis, Scott B.
    Wilcut, John W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 372 - 377
  • [3] Effect of planting date, mepiquat chloride, and glyphosate application to glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Nuti, Russell C.
    Viator, Ryan P.
    Casteel, Shaun N.
    Edmisten, Keith L.
    Wells, Randy
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (06) : 1627 - 1633
  • [4] Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant cotton in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    York, AC
    Stewart, AM
    Vidrine, PR
    Culpepper, AS
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) : 532 - 539
  • [5] Response of Glyphosate-resistant Cotton to Pre-harvest Glyphosate Application
    Stewart, Alexander
    York, Alan
    Culpepper, A.
    Vidrine, P.
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2005, 9 (02): : 110 - 114
  • [6] Absorption and translocation of glyphosate and sucrose in glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Thomas, Walter E.
    Everman, Wesley J.
    Burke, Ian C.
    Koger, Clifford H.
    Wilcut, John W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 459 - 464
  • [7] Timing of glyphosate application on control of silverleaf nightshade and glyphosate-resistant cotton yield
    Choudhary, M
    Bordovsky, DG
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 198 - 203
  • [8] Physiological and morphological effects of glyphosate applications on glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Pline, WA
    Edmisten, KL
    Wilcut, JW
    Wells, R
    BCPC CONFERENCE - WEEDS 2001, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 341 - 344
  • [9] Glyphosate Tolerance in Enhanced Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
    Huff, Jonathan A.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Dodds, Darrin M.
    Irby, J. Trenton
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 289 - 294
  • [10] Effect of glyphosate and MSMA application timing on weed control, fruiting patterns, and yield in glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Edenfield, MW
    Brecke, BJ
    Colvin, DL
    Dusky, JA
    Shilling, DG
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) : 224 - 230