Absorption and translocation of glyphosate and sucrose in glyphosate-resistant cotton

被引:5
|
作者
Thomas, Walter E.
Everman, Wesley J.
Burke, Ian C.
Koger, Clifford H.
Wilcut, John W.
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Delta Res & Extens Ctr, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
关键词
herbicide-resistant crops; transgenic crops;
D O I
10.1614/WT-06-125.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Studies were conducted to evaluate absorption and translocation of C-14-glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton. Both commercial GR cotton events [glyphosate-resistant event 1, marketed as Roundup Ready((R)), released 1997 (GRE1), and glyphosate-resistant event 2, marketed as Roundup Ready Flex((R)), released 2006 (GRE2)] were evaluated at the four-leaf and eight-leaf growth stages. Plants were harvested at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d after treatment (DAT). Glyphosate absorption, as a percentage of applied, increased over time with 29 and 36% absorption at 7 DAT in four-leaf GRE1 and GRE2 cotton, respectively. In eight-leaf cotton, glyphosate absorption (33% at 7 DAT) was not different between events. Glyphosate translocation patterns were not different between events or harvest timings and exhibited a source-sink relation. Observed translocation differences between cotton growth stages were probably due to reduced glyphosate export from the treated leaf of eight-leaf cotton. An additional study compared absorption and translocation of C-14-glyphosate and C-14-sucrose in 5- and 10-leaf GRE2 cotton. Averaged over trials, C-14 compounds, and growth stages, cotton absorbed 28% of the applied dose at 14 DAT. On the basis of the percentage of C-14 exported out of the treated leaf, glyphosate and sucrose translocation patterns were similar, indicating that glyphosate may be used as a photoassimilate model in GRE2 cotton.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 464
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton as influenced by application method and growth stage
    Pline, WA
    Price, AJ
    Wilcut, JW
    Edmisten, KL
    Wells, R
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2001, 49 (04) : 460 - 467
  • [2] Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Interference in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean
    Lee, Donna
    Miller, Donnie
    Blouin, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2009, 13 (02): : 174 - 177
  • [3] Glyphosate-resistant corn interference in glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Thomas, Walter E.
    Everman, Wesley J.
    Clewis, Scott B.
    Wilcut, John W.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 372 - 377
  • [4] Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant cotton in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    York, AC
    Stewart, AM
    Vidrine, PR
    Culpepper, AS
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) : 532 - 539
  • [5] Effect of glyphosate application timings and methods on glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Viator, RP
    Jost, PH
    Senseman, SA
    Cothren, JT
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2004, 52 (01) : 147 - 151
  • [6] Physiological and morphological effects of glyphosate applications on glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Pline, WA
    Edmisten, KL
    Wilcut, JW
    Wells, R
    [J]. BCPC CONFERENCE - WEEDS 2001, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 341 - 344
  • [7] Glyphosate Tolerance in Enhanced Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
    Huff, Jonathan A.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Dodds, Darrin M.
    Irby, J. Trenton
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 289 - 294
  • [8] Weed Response and Tolerance of Enhanced Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton to Glyphosate
    Main, Christopher
    Jones, Michael
    Murdock, Edward
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2007, 11 (02): : 104 - 109
  • [9] Response of Glyphosate-resistant Cotton to Pre-harvest Glyphosate Application
    Stewart, Alexander
    York, Alan
    Culpepper, A.
    Vidrine, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2005, 9 (02): : 110 - 114
  • [10] Preemergence herbicide and glyphosate effects on seedling diseases in glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Pankey, JH
    Griffin, JL
    Colyer, PD
    Schneider, RW
    Miller, DK
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) : 312 - 318