Effect of glyphosate application timings and methods on glyphosate-resistant cotton

被引:17
|
作者
Viator, RP [1 ]
Jost, PH
Senseman, SA
Cothren, JT
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Georgia Cooperat Extens Serv, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
herbicide resistant; transgenic crops;
D O I
10.1614/P2002-025
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Under certain conditions, application of glyphosate to glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton can lead to fruit shedding and yield reductions. Field studies were conducted at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station using GR cotton, cv. 'DeltaPine 5690RR', to determine if application method and timing affect cotton fruit retention. Glyphosate at 1.12 kg ai ha(-1) was precisely postdirected (PD), postdirected with 25% foliage coverage (PDFC), or applied over the top (OT) at the 8- or 18-leaf stage after an initial topical application of 1.12 kg ha(-1) glyphosate at the four-leaf stage. In one of the years of this study, 8 PD, 18 PDFQ and 18 OT reduced yield. In 1999 and 2000, 8 PDFC and 8 OT applications of glyphosate caused yield loss, mainly due to lower mean boll weight. Glyphosate applied topically at the eight-leaf stage also affected the Position 1 boll retention throughout the plant in both years. Glyphosate contact with leaves and stems should be avoided when applying glyphosate after the four-leaf stage to prevent possible yield loss.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 151
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Spring and Fall Burndown Application Timings on Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in No-Till Cotton
    Owen, Lucas N.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    Koger, Cliford H.
    Main, Christopher L.
    Mueller, Thomas C.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (03) : 335 - 339
  • [22] Physiological and morphological response of glyphosate-resistant and non-glyphosate-resistant cotton seedlings to root-absorbed glyphosate
    Pline, WA
    Wilcut, JW
    Edmisten, KL
    Wells, R
    PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 73 (01) : 48 - 58
  • [23] Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Corn Interference and Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Sugarbeet
    Kniss, Andrew R.
    Sbatella, Gustavo M.
    Wilson, Robert G.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 348 - 355
  • [24] Evolution of glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Vila-Aiub, Martin M.
    Balbi, Maria C.
    Gundel, Pedro E.
    Ghersa, Claudio M.
    Powles, Stephen B.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2007, 55 (06) : 566 - 571
  • [25] Control of Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Canola in Glyphosate-Resistant Sugar Beet
    Kumar, Vipan
    Jha, Prashant
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [26] Comparison of glyphosate products in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and corn (Zea mays)
    Parker, RG
    York, AC
    Jordan, DL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 796 - 802
  • [27] The rise and future of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops
    Green, Jerry M.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 (05) : 1035 - 1039
  • [28] Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate
    Elmore, RW
    Roeth, FW
    Klein, RN
    Knezevic, SZ
    Martin, A
    Nelson, LA
    Shapiro, CA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (02) : 404 - 407
  • [29] Sustainability and stewardship of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops
    Sammons, R. Douglas
    Heering, David C.
    Dinicola, Natalie
    Glick, Harvey
    Elmore, Greg A.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 347 - 354
  • [30] Rise and future of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops
    Green, Jerry
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252