Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post First Lumbar Discectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:27
|
作者
Rushton, Alison [1 ]
Wright, Chris [1 ]
Goodwin, Peter [2 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ]
Freemantle, Nick [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Sch Hlth & Populat Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Psychol & Social Care, Dept Profess Registrat, Manchester M13 0JA, Lancs, England
[3] UCL Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London NW3 2PF, England
关键词
lumbar discectomy; spinal surgery; physiotherapy; rehabilitation; systematic review; meta-analysis; BEHAVIORAL-GRADED ACTIVITY; DYNAMIC BACK EXERCISES; DISC SURGERY; FOLLOW-UP; POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS; QUALITY; HERNIATION; OUTCOMES; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f0e8f8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. To evaluate effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention in patients post first lumbar discectomy on clinically relevant outcomes short (3 months) and longer term (12 months). Summary of Background Data. Physiotherapy intervention is recommended post discectomy, although the most beneficial intervention and the effectiveness of physiotherapy management is unclear. Methods. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in English before December 31, 2009 investigating physiotherapy outpatient management of patients (>16 years), post first single level lumbar discectomy were included. Measurements reported on >= 1 outcome of disability, function, and health were included. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed studies for inclusion, and evaluated risk of bias. Quantitative synthesis was conducted on comparable outcomes across studies with similar interventions and no clearly identified overall risk of bias. Results. Sixteen RCTs (1336 participants) from 11 countries were included. Interventions were categorized as intervention versus control/sham, and less versus more intensive comparisons. Eight of 16 trials were evaluated as high risk of bias, 7 as unclear and 1 as low. Six hundred and thirty-five participants were incorporated in the meta-analysis on eight trials. Although evidence from two trials suggested that intervention might reduce disability short-term, and more intensive intervention may be more beneficial than less intensive, the pooled effects (-0.89, 95% CI -1.84 to 0.06 for intervention vs. control/sham; -0.27, 95% CI -0.80 to 0.25 for more vs. less intensive) did not show statistically significant effects. There was no evidence that intervention changes range of movement flexion (ROM) or overall impairment short term, or disability or back pain longer term. There was no evidence that intensity of intervention affects back pain short or longer term, ROM short term, or patients' satisfaction with outcome longer term. Substantial heterogeneity was evident. Conclusion. Inconclusive evidence exists for the effectiveness of outpatient physiotherapy post first lumbar discectomy. Best practice remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:E961 / E972
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacopuncture for asthma: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bang, Miran
    Chang, Seju
    Kim, Jang Hyun
    Min, Sang Yeon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 11 : 6 - 17
  • [42] Garlic for hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiong, X. J.
    Wang, P. Q.
    Li, S. J.
    Li, X. K.
    Zhang, Y. Q.
    Wang, J.
    PHYTOMEDICINE, 2015, 22 (03) : 352 - 361
  • [43] Methotrexate for osteoarthritis: a systematic review meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ivo Queiroz
    Túlio Pimentel
    Mariano Gallo Ruelas
    Arthur Henrique Tavares
    Lucas M. Barbosa
    Maria L. R. Defante
    Giovanna N. Leandro
    Arthur Ribeiro Monteiro
    Fernando Nunes Pimentel
    Inflammopharmacology, 2025, 33 (1) : 135 - 144
  • [44] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Jaaback, Kenneth
    INTRAPERITONEAL CANCER THERAPY, 2007, : 31 - 44
  • [45] Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lawler, Patrick R.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 162 (04) : 571 - U25
  • [46] Efficacy of acupuncture versus rehabilitation therapy on post-stroke shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhan, Jie
    Luo, Ying
    Mao, Wenjin
    Zhu, Leying
    Xu, Fanfeng
    Wang, Yuan
    Chen, Hongxia
    Zhan, Lechang
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (29) : E34266
  • [47] Pre-Procedural Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound-A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis
    Sidiropoulou, Tatiana
    Christodoulaki, Kalliopi
    Siristatidis, Charalampos
    HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [48] Constraint-induced aphasia therapy in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Yu, Jiadan
    Bao, Yong
    Xie, Qing
    Xu, Yang
    Zhang, Junmei
    Wang, Pu
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [49] Physiotherapy as an Initial Treatment Option for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis of 5 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hoit, Graeme
    Whelan, Daniel B.
    Dwyer, Tim
    Ajrawat, Prabjit
    Chahal, Jaskarndip
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (08): : 2042 - 2050
  • [50] Posterolateral Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Said, Elsayed
    Abdel-Wanis, Mohamed E.
    Ameen, Mohamed
    Sayed, Ali A.
    Mosallam, Khaled H.
    Ahmed, Ahmed M.
    Tammam, Hamdy
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (05) : 990 - 1002