Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post First Lumbar Discectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:27
|
作者
Rushton, Alison [1 ]
Wright, Chris [1 ]
Goodwin, Peter [2 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ]
Freemantle, Nick [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Sch Hlth & Populat Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Psychol & Social Care, Dept Profess Registrat, Manchester M13 0JA, Lancs, England
[3] UCL Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London NW3 2PF, England
关键词
lumbar discectomy; spinal surgery; physiotherapy; rehabilitation; systematic review; meta-analysis; BEHAVIORAL-GRADED ACTIVITY; DYNAMIC BACK EXERCISES; DISC SURGERY; FOLLOW-UP; POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS; QUALITY; HERNIATION; OUTCOMES; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f0e8f8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. To evaluate effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention in patients post first lumbar discectomy on clinically relevant outcomes short (3 months) and longer term (12 months). Summary of Background Data. Physiotherapy intervention is recommended post discectomy, although the most beneficial intervention and the effectiveness of physiotherapy management is unclear. Methods. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in English before December 31, 2009 investigating physiotherapy outpatient management of patients (>16 years), post first single level lumbar discectomy were included. Measurements reported on >= 1 outcome of disability, function, and health were included. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed studies for inclusion, and evaluated risk of bias. Quantitative synthesis was conducted on comparable outcomes across studies with similar interventions and no clearly identified overall risk of bias. Results. Sixteen RCTs (1336 participants) from 11 countries were included. Interventions were categorized as intervention versus control/sham, and less versus more intensive comparisons. Eight of 16 trials were evaluated as high risk of bias, 7 as unclear and 1 as low. Six hundred and thirty-five participants were incorporated in the meta-analysis on eight trials. Although evidence from two trials suggested that intervention might reduce disability short-term, and more intensive intervention may be more beneficial than less intensive, the pooled effects (-0.89, 95% CI -1.84 to 0.06 for intervention vs. control/sham; -0.27, 95% CI -0.80 to 0.25 for more vs. less intensive) did not show statistically significant effects. There was no evidence that intervention changes range of movement flexion (ROM) or overall impairment short term, or disability or back pain longer term. There was no evidence that intensity of intervention affects back pain short or longer term, ROM short term, or patients' satisfaction with outcome longer term. Substantial heterogeneity was evident. Conclusion. Inconclusive evidence exists for the effectiveness of outpatient physiotherapy post first lumbar discectomy. Best practice remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:E961 / E972
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corticosteroids for neurocysticercosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A.
    Roldan-Benitez, Yetiani M.
    Perez-Gaxiola, Giordano
    Villarreal-Careaga, Jorge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 17 (08) : E583 - E592
  • [32] Acupuncture for tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Kaiyu
    Liang, Shuang
    Chen, Lei
    Grellet, Antoine
    ACUPUNCTURE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 39 (04) : 264 - 271
  • [33] Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vered Daitch
    Adi Turjeman
    Itamar Poran
    Noam Tau
    Irit Ayalon-Dangur
    Jeries Nashashibi
    Dafna Yahav
    Mical Paul
    Leonard Leibovici
    Trials, 23
  • [34] The Safety of Yoga: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cramer, Holger
    Ward, Lesley
    Saper, Robert
    Fishbein, Daniel
    Dobos, Gustav
    Lauche, Romy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 182 (04) : 281 - 293
  • [35] Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Daitch, Vered
    Turjeman, Adi
    Poran, Itamar
    Tau, Noam
    Ayalon-Dangur, Irit
    Nashashibi, Jeries
    Yahav, Dafna
    Paul, Mical
    Leibovici, Leonard
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [36] Pharmacopuncture in Korea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Park, Jimin
    Lee, Hyangsook
    Shin, Byung-Cheul
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Kim, Boryang
    Kim, Jong-In
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 2016
  • [37] Probiotics for dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kruger, Jenifer F.
    Hillesheim, Elaine
    Pereira, Amanda C. S. N.
    Camargo, Carolina Q.
    Rabito, Estela, I
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2021, 79 (02) : 160 - 170
  • [38] Xenon Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Law, Lawrence Siu-Chun
    Lo, Elaine Ah-Gi
    Gan, Tong Joo
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (03): : 678 - 697
  • [39] Yoga for anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cramer, Holger
    Lauche, Romy
    Anheyer, Dennis
    Pilkington, Karen
    de Manincor, Michael
    Dobos, Gustav
    Ward, Lesley
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2018, 35 (09) : 830 - 843
  • [40] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on Wenxin keli
    Wang, Xiaoyi
    Wang, Ying
    Feng, Xiaoyuan
    Lu, Ying
    Zhang, Yu
    Wang, Wenwen
    Zhu, Wentao
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2016, 10 : 3725 - 3736