Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post First Lumbar Discectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:27
|
作者
Rushton, Alison [1 ]
Wright, Chris [1 ]
Goodwin, Peter [2 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ]
Freemantle, Nick [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Sch Hlth & Populat Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Psychol & Social Care, Dept Profess Registrat, Manchester M13 0JA, Lancs, England
[3] UCL Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London NW3 2PF, England
关键词
lumbar discectomy; spinal surgery; physiotherapy; rehabilitation; systematic review; meta-analysis; BEHAVIORAL-GRADED ACTIVITY; DYNAMIC BACK EXERCISES; DISC SURGERY; FOLLOW-UP; POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS; QUALITY; HERNIATION; OUTCOMES; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f0e8f8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. To evaluate effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention in patients post first lumbar discectomy on clinically relevant outcomes short (3 months) and longer term (12 months). Summary of Background Data. Physiotherapy intervention is recommended post discectomy, although the most beneficial intervention and the effectiveness of physiotherapy management is unclear. Methods. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in English before December 31, 2009 investigating physiotherapy outpatient management of patients (>16 years), post first single level lumbar discectomy were included. Measurements reported on >= 1 outcome of disability, function, and health were included. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed studies for inclusion, and evaluated risk of bias. Quantitative synthesis was conducted on comparable outcomes across studies with similar interventions and no clearly identified overall risk of bias. Results. Sixteen RCTs (1336 participants) from 11 countries were included. Interventions were categorized as intervention versus control/sham, and less versus more intensive comparisons. Eight of 16 trials were evaluated as high risk of bias, 7 as unclear and 1 as low. Six hundred and thirty-five participants were incorporated in the meta-analysis on eight trials. Although evidence from two trials suggested that intervention might reduce disability short-term, and more intensive intervention may be more beneficial than less intensive, the pooled effects (-0.89, 95% CI -1.84 to 0.06 for intervention vs. control/sham; -0.27, 95% CI -0.80 to 0.25 for more vs. less intensive) did not show statistically significant effects. There was no evidence that intervention changes range of movement flexion (ROM) or overall impairment short term, or disability or back pain longer term. There was no evidence that intensity of intervention affects back pain short or longer term, ROM short term, or patients' satisfaction with outcome longer term. Substantial heterogeneity was evident. Conclusion. Inconclusive evidence exists for the effectiveness of outpatient physiotherapy post first lumbar discectomy. Best practice remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:E961 / E972
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physiotherapy rehabilitation following lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Rushton, Alison
    Eveleigh, Gillian
    Petherick, Emma-Jane
    Heneghan, Nicola
    Bennett, Rosalie
    James, Gill
    Wright, Chris
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (04):
  • [2] Effects of the Feldenkrais Method as a Physiotherapy Tool: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Berland, Remi
    Marques-Sule, Elena
    Luis Marin-Mateo, Jose
    Moreno-Segura, Noemi
    Lopez-Ridaura, Ana
    Sentandreu-Mano, Trinidad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [3] REHABILITATION INTERVENTIONS FOR NEUROPATHIC PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Backryd, Emmanuel
    Ghafouri, Nazdar
    Gerdle, Bjorn
    Dragioti, Elena
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2024, 56
  • [4] Tai Chi for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lyu, Diyang
    Lyu, Xuanxin
    Zhang, Yong
    Ren, Yi
    Yang, Fan
    Zhou, Li
    Zou, Yihuai
    Li, Zongheng
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [5] Baduanjin Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zou, Liye
    Wang, Chaoyi
    Chen, Xiaoan
    Wang, Huiru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (04)
  • [6] Rehabilitation of Cognitive Deficits Poststroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    O'Donoghue, Mairead
    Leahy, Siobhan
    Boland, Pauline
    Galvin, Rose
    McManus, John
    Hayes, Sara
    STROKE, 2022, 53 (05) : 1700 - 1710
  • [7] Physiotherapy rehabilitation for whiplash associated disorder II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Rushton, Alison
    Wright, Chris
    Heneghan, Nicola
    Eveleigh, Gillian
    Calvert, Melanie
    Freemantle, Nick
    BMJ OPEN, 2011, 1 (02):
  • [8] Physiotherapy rehabilitation for whiplash associated disorder II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Michaleff, Zoe A.
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 46 (09) : 662 - 663
  • [9] Comparative outcomes of epidural steroids versus placebo after lumbar discectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Arirachakaran A.
    Siripaiboonkij M.
    Pairuchvej S.
    Setrkraising K.
    Pruttikul P.
    Piyasakulkaew C.
    Kongtharvonskul J.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018, 28 (8) : 1589 - 1599
  • [10] EFFECTS OF PHYSIOTHERAPY INTERVENTIONS ON BALANCE IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Paltamaa, Jaana
    Sjogren, Tuulikki
    Peurala, Sinikka H.
    Heinonen, An
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2012, 44 (10) : 811 - 823