Polyaxial locking plates in treating distal humeral fractures: a comparative randomized trial for clinical outcome

被引:4
|
作者
Croenlein, Moritz [1 ]
Lucke, Martin [3 ]
Beirer, Marc [1 ]
Pfoerringer, Dominik [1 ]
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig [1 ]
Biberthaler, Peter [1 ]
Braun, Karl F. [1 ]
Siebenlist, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Trauma Surg, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Orthopaed Sports Med, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[3] Chirurg Klinikum Munchen Sud, Dept Trauma Surg, Isarkanal 30, D-81379 Munich, Germany
来源
关键词
Distal humeral fracture; Locking plate; Anatomical preshaped; Polyaxial; Outcome; INTRAARTICULAR FRACTURES; FEMUR FRACTURES; FIXATION; CONFIGURATION; STABILITY; SYSTEMS; SCREWS;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-017-1910-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Management of distal humeral fractures remains to be one of the most challenging aspects in trauma surgery. Low profile plating systems with variable angle screw fixation represent a crucial advancement to the established angular stable locking plates with considerable attention in current research. The aim of the prospective randomized trial was to review the preliminary results and patients' outcome following treatment with these newly developed implants and to rule out potential differences in fracture treatment of two different plating systems. Methods: Twenty patients with distal humeral fractures (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) were included in the current study since 2014. After completing the randomization plan, patients were distributed into two groups for different variable angle locking plates (DePuy Synthes (R) VA-LCP vs. Medartis (R) Aptus Elbow). Functional elbow scoring (ROM, MEPS, QuickDASH) served as primary outcome parameter, while radiological fracture consolidation served as secondary outcome parameter. Follow-ups were conducted 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the operation. Results: Seventeen of 20 patients (85%) concluded all follow-up examinations. Postoperative elbow extension deficiencies showed significant differences between the two groups in all follow-up examinations with a mean of (sic) 18 +/- 7.4 degrees in the DePuy Synthes (R) VA-LCP group compared to a mean of (sic) 6.5 +/- 7.5 degrees in the Medartis (R) Aptus Elbow group (p = 0.002) 12 months postoperatively. Functional scoring showed a disparate pattern. The Medartis (R) Aptus Elbow group achieved significantly better MEP scores during follow-up. However, the analysis of the QuickDash revealed better results of the DePuy Synthes (R) VA-LCP group in the first half and better results of the Medartis (R) Aptus Elbow group in the second half of the follow-up examination instead. Conclusions: Considering the complexity of distal humeral fractures, the usage of anatomically preshaped low profile variable angle locking plates for operative treatment leads to good clinical results. Even though there might be some advances of the Medartis (R) Aptus Elbow plating system concerning postoperative ROM and elbow function, a consistent difference in the overall clinical outcome between the two plating systems could not be detected.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polyaxial locking plates in treating distal humeral fractures: a comparative randomized trial for clinical outcome
    Moritz Crönlein
    Martin Lucke
    Marc Beirer
    Dominik Pförringer
    Chlodwig Kirchhoff
    Peter Biberthaler
    Karl F. Braun
    Sebastian Siebenlist
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18
  • [2] Mono versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial
    Liu, Yueju
    Li, Han
    Zhang, Yingze
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (07) : 1543 - 1543
  • [3] Mono versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial
    Yueju Liu
    Han Li
    Yingze Zhang
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 1543 - 1543
  • [4] Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial
    Marc Hanschen
    Ina M. Aschenbrenner
    Kai Fehske
    Sonja Kirchhoff
    Leonhard Keil
    Boris M. Holzapfel
    Sebastian Winkler
    Bernd Fuechtmeier
    Rainer Neugebauer
    Sven Luehrs
    Ulrich Liener
    Peter Biberthaler
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 857 - 863
  • [5] Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial
    Hanschen, Marc
    Aschenbrenner, Ina M.
    Fehske, Kai
    Kirchhoff, Sonja
    Keil, Leonhard
    Holzapfel, Boris M.
    Winkler, Sebastian
    Fuechtmeier, Bernd
    Neugebauer, Rainer
    Luehrs, Sven
    Liener, Ulrich
    Biberthaler, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (04) : 857 - 863
  • [6] Re: Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial
    Hanschen, Marc
    Biberthaler, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (08) : 1751 - 1752
  • [7] Re: Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial
    Marc Hanschen
    Peter Biberthaler
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 1751 - 1752
  • [8] Clinical outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures treated with polyaxial locking plates
    Hoffmann, M. F.
    Lotzien, S.
    Schildhauer, T. A.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (04): : 934 - 938
  • [9] Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial
    Voelk, Dominik
    Neumaier, Markus
    Einhellig, Heike
    Biberthaler, Peter
    Hanschen, Marc
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [10] Are locking plates better than non-locking plates for treating distal tibial fractures?
    Bastias, Christian
    Henriquez, Hugo
    Pellegrini, Manuel
    Rammelt, Stefan
    Cuchacovich, Natalio
    Lagos, Leonardo
    Carcuro, Giovanni
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2014, 20 (02) : 115 - 119