Index of microvascular resistance and outcomes following intra-coronary thrombolysis with percutaneous intervention in STEMI: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

被引:9
|
作者
Kumar, Ashish [1 ]
Shariff, Mariam [1 ]
Doshi, Rajkumar [2 ]
机构
[1] St Johns Med Coll Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] Univ Nevada Reno, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Reno, NV USA
关键词
Intra-coronary thrombolysis; Microvascular obstruction; Index of microvascular resistance; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; INTRACORONARY STREPTOKINASE; OBSTRUCTION; THROMBECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s11239-020-02063-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Microvascular obstruction following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is highly prevalent and independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Microvascular obstruction is determined by index of the microvascular resistance. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of all published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) studying the effect of intra-coronary thrombolysis with PCI as compared to standard treatment among patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction. We included 6 RCTs summing up to 947 patients in the final analysis. Intra-coronary thrombolysis resulted in significantly lower index of microvascular resistance [standardized mean difference: - 13.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 16.74 to - 10.73, P value < 0.001, I-2 = 0%]. There was no difference noted in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events with intra-coronary thrombolysis as compared to standard treatment [Odds ratio: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.46-1.08, P value = 0.11, I-2 = 0%]. The absence of heterogeneity deferred us from using dose-response analysis to account for altering dose used across studies. The results of the present meta-analysis highlights the role of intra-coronary thrombolysis in reducing microvascular obstruction. No effect of intra-coronary thrombolysis was noted on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 491
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bivalirudin versus heparin for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lipinski, Michael J.
    Lhermusier, Thibault
    Escarcega, Ricardo O.
    Baker, Nevin C.
    Magalhaes, Marco A.
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Suddath, William O.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Waksman, Ron
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (6-7) : 315 - 322
  • [32] Optical coherence tomography guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sharan Prakash Sharma
    Jharendra Rijal
    Khagendra Dahal
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2019, 34 : 113 - 121
  • [33] Bleeding events associated with fibrinolytic therapy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bundhun, Pravesh Kumar
    Janoo, Girish
    Chen, Meng-Hua
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (23)
  • [34] Clinical Outcomes Following Optical Coherence Tomographic Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Dodoo, Sheriff N.
    Ibrahim, Sammudeen
    Osman, Abdul-Fatawu
    Balaji, Nivedha
    Salih, Rayan
    Kilaru, Vikas
    Ampadu, Dennis K.
    Dodoo, Afia S.
    Egolum, Ugochukwu
    Toleva, Olga
    Ghasemzadeh, Nima
    Ramadan, Ronnie
    Giugliano, Gregory
    Henry, Glen
    Ibebuogu, Uzoma
    Samady, Habib
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025, 105 (02) : 532 - 540
  • [35] Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sedhom, Ramy
    Megaly, Michael
    Abraham, Bishoy
    Kalra, Sanjog
    Janzer, Sean
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B183 - B183
  • [36] Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sedhom, Ramy
    Megaly, Michael
    Abraham, Bishoy
    George, Jon C.
    Kalra, Sanjog
    Janzer, Sean
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 26 : 39 - 45
  • [37] Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Yetgin, Tuncay
    Manintveld, Olivier C.
    Boersma, Eric
    Kappetein, Arie P.
    van Geuns, Robert-Jan
    Zijlstra, Felix
    Duncker, Dirk J.
    van der Giessen, Wim J.
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (10) : 2392 - 2404
  • [38] Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Rijal, Jharendra
    Lee, Juyong
    Korr, Kenneth S.
    Azrin, Michael
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (05) : 857 - 865
  • [39] Index of Microcirculatory Resistance to predict microvascular obstruction in STEMI: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jeyaprakash, Prajith
    Mikhail, Philopatir
    Ford, Thomas J.
    Pathan, Faraz
    Berry, Colin
    Negishi, Kazuaki
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 103 (02) : 249 - 259
  • [40] Intravascular Imaging Improves Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gomes, Wilton F.
    Zerlotto, Djinane S.
    Viana, Patricia
    Lucena, Larissa A.
    Carvalho, Pedro E. P.
    Nicz, Pedro F. G.
    Nercolini, Deborah C.
    Ribeiro, Marcelo H.
    Quadros, Alexandre S.
    Bueno, Ronaldo R. L.
    Costa, Ricardo A.
    Falcao, Breno A. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 245 : 62 - 70