Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:33
|
作者
Yetgin, Tuncay [1 ,3 ]
Manintveld, Olivier C. [1 ]
Boersma, Eric [1 ]
Kappetein, Arie P. [2 ]
van Geuns, Robert-Jan [1 ]
Zijlstra, Felix [1 ]
Duncker, Dirk J. [1 ]
van der Giessen, Wim J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Thoraxctr, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Thoraxctr, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Interuniv Cardiol Inst Netherlands, ICIN KNAW, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Coronary artery bypass grafting; Myocardial injury; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Remote ischemic preconditioning; MYOCARDIAL INFARCT SIZE; K-ATP CHANNEL; REPERFUSION INJURY; ANESTHETIC AGENTS; SURGERY; PROTECTION; ISOFLURANE; REDUCTION; ELEVATION; BIAS;
D O I
10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0518
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) by transient limb ischemia in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has shown favorable effects on myocardial (ischemia-reperfusion) injury, recent trials provide inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of RIC in PCI or CABG. Methods and Results: Medline/Embase/conference reports were searched for randomized RIC trials and were included if they reported on biomarkers of myocardial injury (CK-MB/troponin T/I), after which, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated (Hedges g statistic). Meta-analysis of 4 studies on PCI, involving 557 patients, indicated reduced biomarkers for myocardial injury with RIC compared to control (random effects model: SMD, -0.21; 95% confidence interval [Cl]: -0.66 to 0.24). Analysis of primary PCI studies, involving 314 patients, indicated a highly significant positive effect of RIC on myocardial injury (SMD, -0.55; 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.32). The 13 CABG studies taken together, involving 891 patients, indicated a significant effect of RIC on myocardial injury (SMD, -0.34; 95% Cl: -0.59 to -0.08). The statistical tests indicated moderate to high heterogeneity across the studies (Q-statistic: PCI, P=0.0006, I-2=83%; CABG, P<0.0001, I-2=69%). Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI or CABG, RIC with transient episodes of limb ischennia is associated with lower biomarkers of myocardial injury compared to control, but this effect failed to reach statistical significance in the overall PCI analysis. (Circ J 2012; 76: 2392-2404)
引用
收藏
页码:2392 / 2404
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote ischaemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Yetgin, T.
    Manintveld, O. C.
    Duncker, D. J.
    Boersma, E.
    Van der Giessen, W. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 420 - 420
  • [2] Stroke in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Shah, Anishee K.
    Retana, Alexandra K.
    Trikalinos, Thomas
    Wong, John B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (10) : A250 - A250
  • [3] Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A Meta-Analysis and Regression of Randomized Trials
    Mahmoud, Ahmed N.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Mentias, Amgad
    Saad, Marwan
    Ibrahim, Walid
    Mojadidi, Mohammad K.
    Nairooz, Ramez
    Eshtehardi, Parham
    Anderson, R. David
    Samady, Habib
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (04) : 541 - 552
  • [4] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Khalid, Muhammad Faisal
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    Ayub, Muhammad T.
    Kohli, Varun
    Paul, Timir K.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (04) : S20 - S21
  • [5] Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sharma, Sharan P.
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Khatra, Jaspreet
    Rosenfeld, Alan
    Lee, Juyong
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 35 (03)
  • [6] Remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yao, Yun-tai
    Gong, Jun-song
    Fang, Neng-xin
    Li, Li-huan
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 120 : 101 - 101
  • [7] Determinants of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bhaskaran, Premjithlal
    Sanal, T. S.
    Bhaskaran, India Premjithlal
    Anastasiou, Nikolaos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (05) : PE1 - PE5
  • [8] Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Ueyama, Hiroki
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.
    Thompson, Craig
    Takagi, Hisato
    Bangalore, Sripal
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 227 : 9 - 10
  • [9] Remote ischaemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Niu, Xiaowei
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Chen, De
    Wan, Guozhen
    Zhang, Yiming
    Yao, Yali
    [J]. POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2014, 10 (04): : 274 - 282
  • [10] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hennessy, C.
    Henry, J. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 249 - 249