Evaluation of the functional results and safety of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Kotov, S., V [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guspanov, R., I [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Byadretdinov, I. Sh [1 ]
Ryabov, M. A. [3 ]
Pulbere, S. A. [1 ,2 ]
Yusufov, A. G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhilov, M. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NI Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Minist Hlth Russia, 1 Ostrovityanova St, Moscow 117997, Russia
[2] NI Pirogov Russian Natl 1, Moscow Healthcare Dept, 8 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049, Russia
[3] Clin & Diagnost Ctr MEDSI Krasnaya Presnya, 16 Krasnaya Presnya St, Moscow 123242, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2022年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; urinary continence; urethral catheter removal; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-1-38-47
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Currently, there is no single point of view on the timing of safe removal of the urethral catheter in patients who have undergone laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Objective of the study: to evaluate the safety and functional results of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods. In the period from January 2020 until April 2021, the study included 100 patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by one surgeon. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 50) included patients with the urethral catheter removed on the second day after surgery. Group B (n = 50) the control group - included patients with standard catheter removal (14 days). Results. According to the results of cystography, in group A extravasation of a contrast agent from the zone of urethro-vesical anastomosis was determined in 3 (6 %) cases. Seven (14 %) patients developed acute urinary retention after the removal of the urethral catheter. Among 2 patients acute urinary retention occurred immediately after catheter removal. In 5 cases acute urinary retention developed 2-7 days after catheter removal. These patients underwent repeated catheterization for a period of 2-3 days. In our study, removal of the urethral catheter on the second day increased the dynamic of restoring urinary continence in the postoperative period. The frequency of complete recovery of urinary continence (0-1 pad per day) in the groups A and B, respectively, was: after 1 month - 22 and 16 %, after 6 months - 64 and 54 %, after 12 months - 78 and 78 %. Urinary incontinence in the groups A and B was as follows: mild (2-3 pads per day): after 1 month - 40 and 34 %, after 6 months - 30 and 32 %, after 12 months - 20 and 18 %; moderate (4-5 pads per day): after 1 month - 20 and 26 %, after 6 months - 6 and 10 %, after 12 months - 2 and 2 %; severe (6 pads or more): after 1 month - 18 and 24 %, after 6 months - 0 and 4 %, after 12 months - 0 and 2 %. Conclusion. Early removal of the urethral catheter (2 days) in patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a relatively safe method that improves the restoration of urinary continence.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 47
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation of urine loss after catheter removal and early continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy
    Hoeh, B.
    Wenzel, M.
    Humke, C.
    Wittler, C.
    Hohenhorst, J. L.
    Volckmann-Wilde, M.
    Koellermann, J.
    Steuber, T.
    Graefen, M.
    Derya, T.
    Karakiewicz, P.
    Becker, A.
    Kluth, L. A.
    Chun, F. K. H.
    Mandel, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1670 - S1670
  • [42] Correlation of Urine Loss after Catheter Removal and Early Continence in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Preisser, Felix
    Wenzel, Mike
    Humke, Clara
    Wittler, Clarissa
    Hohenhorst, Jan L.
    Volckmann-Wilde, Maja
    Koellermann, Jens
    Steuber, Thomas
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Becker, Andreas
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Mandel, Philipp
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 4738 - 4747
  • [43] Improved early continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the urethral hammock technique
    Ortner, Gernot
    Honis, Hanne-Rose
    Boehm, Julia
    Konschake, Marko
    Tokas, Theodoros
    Nagele, Udo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [44] RESULTS OF URINE CULTURES AT THE TIME OF CATHETER REMOVAL FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Banks, Jessica A.
    Shrestha, Sanjina
    O'Brien, Daniel C.
    Cooper, Phillip R.
    Kan, Donghui
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Catalona, William J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E241 - E242
  • [45] Evaluation of sexual activity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Rozet, Francois
    Cathala, Nathalie
    Mombet, Annick
    Barret, Eric
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Vallancien, Guy
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A153 - A153
  • [47] Percutaneous cystostomy drainage for early removing urethral catheter in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Improving on patients' discomfort
    Yang, Che-Jui
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    Yang, Chun-Kuang
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (04) : 240 - 242
  • [48] Functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy
    Salomon, L.
    Droupy, S.
    Yiou, R.
    Soulie, M.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2015, 25 (15): : 1028 - 1066
  • [49] Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Su, Li-Ming
    Link, Richard E.
    Sullivan, Wendy
    Wagner, Andrew
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (06): : 2448 - 2452
  • [50] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases
    Bollens, R
    Vanden Bossche, M
    Roumeguere, T
    Damoun, A
    Ekane, S
    Hoffmann, P
    Zlotta, AR
    Schulman, CC
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 65 - 69