Evaluation of the functional results and safety of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Kotov, S., V [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guspanov, R., I [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Byadretdinov, I. Sh [1 ]
Ryabov, M. A. [3 ]
Pulbere, S. A. [1 ,2 ]
Yusufov, A. G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhilov, M. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NI Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Minist Hlth Russia, 1 Ostrovityanova St, Moscow 117997, Russia
[2] NI Pirogov Russian Natl 1, Moscow Healthcare Dept, 8 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049, Russia
[3] Clin & Diagnost Ctr MEDSI Krasnaya Presnya, 16 Krasnaya Presnya St, Moscow 123242, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2022年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; urinary continence; urethral catheter removal; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-1-38-47
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Currently, there is no single point of view on the timing of safe removal of the urethral catheter in patients who have undergone laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Objective of the study: to evaluate the safety and functional results of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods. In the period from January 2020 until April 2021, the study included 100 patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by one surgeon. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 50) included patients with the urethral catheter removed on the second day after surgery. Group B (n = 50) the control group - included patients with standard catheter removal (14 days). Results. According to the results of cystography, in group A extravasation of a contrast agent from the zone of urethro-vesical anastomosis was determined in 3 (6 %) cases. Seven (14 %) patients developed acute urinary retention after the removal of the urethral catheter. Among 2 patients acute urinary retention occurred immediately after catheter removal. In 5 cases acute urinary retention developed 2-7 days after catheter removal. These patients underwent repeated catheterization for a period of 2-3 days. In our study, removal of the urethral catheter on the second day increased the dynamic of restoring urinary continence in the postoperative period. The frequency of complete recovery of urinary continence (0-1 pad per day) in the groups A and B, respectively, was: after 1 month - 22 and 16 %, after 6 months - 64 and 54 %, after 12 months - 78 and 78 %. Urinary incontinence in the groups A and B was as follows: mild (2-3 pads per day): after 1 month - 40 and 34 %, after 6 months - 30 and 32 %, after 12 months - 20 and 18 %; moderate (4-5 pads per day): after 1 month - 20 and 26 %, after 6 months - 6 and 10 %, after 12 months - 2 and 2 %; severe (6 pads or more): after 1 month - 18 and 24 %, after 6 months - 0 and 4 %, after 12 months - 0 and 2 %. Conclusion. Early removal of the urethral catheter (2 days) in patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a relatively safe method that improves the restoration of urinary continence.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 47
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable
    Lepor, H
    Nieder, AM
    Fraiman, MC
    UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (03) : 425 - 429
  • [32] Urethral catheter entrapped in vesicourethral anastomotic sutures after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy successfully removed by transurethral approach
    Yoshihara, Kentaro
    Tashiro, Kojiro
    Kimura, Shoji
    Yasue, Keiji
    Urabe, Fumihiko
    Yamada, Hiroki
    Kimura, Takahiro
    IJU CASE REPORTS, 2024, 7 (04) : 333 - 335
  • [33] Oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Zheng, Tao
    Zhang, Xu
    Ma, Xin
    Li, Hong-Zhao
    Gao, Jiang-Pin
    Cai, We
    Chen, Guang-Fu
    Dong, Jun
    Wang, Bao-Jun
    Shi, Tao-Ping
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 4 (02) : 351 - 357
  • [34] Radical laparoscopic prostatectomy: early results in 28 cases
    Guillonneau, B
    Cathelineau, X
    Barret, E
    Rozet, F
    Vallancien, G
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1998, 27 (31): : 1570 - 1574
  • [35] ELIMINATION OF URETHRAL CATHETER AFTER PROSTATECTOMY
    HENRIET, R
    JOURNAL D UROLOGIE ET DE NEPHROLOGIE, 1979, 85 (10-1): : 793 - 795
  • [36] Role of Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy at the Moment of Catheter Removal after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Pinochet, Rodrigo
    Nogueira, Lucas
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Katz, Darren
    Rabbani, Farhang
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Touijer, Karim
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 85 (04) : 415 - 420
  • [37] Oncological and functional results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 100 procedures: our experience
    Parma, P.
    DalL'Oglio, B.
    Samuelli, A.
    Guatelli, S.
    Bondavalli, C.
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2009, 76 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [38] Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Matsushima, Masashi
    Miyajima, Akira
    Hattori, Seiya
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Oya, Mototsugu
    BMC UROLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [39] Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Masashi Matsushima
    Akira Miyajima
    Seiya Hattori
    Toshikazu Takeda
    Ryuichi Mizuno
    Eiji Kikuchi
    Mototsugu Oya
    BMC Urology, 15
  • [40] Urethral length and diameter of the external urethral sphincter as predictors of continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Minami, K.
    Ooishi, Y.
    Azumi, M.
    Harabayashi, T.
    Nagamori, S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E1052 - U197