Power and sample size calculation for stepped-wedge designs with discrete outcomes

被引:11
|
作者
Xia, Fan [1 ]
Hughes, James P. [2 ]
Voldal, Emily C. [2 ]
Heagerty, Patrick J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Nat Alzheimers Coordinating Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Stepped-wedge designs; Power calculation; Non-normal outcomes; Minimal computational power; CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-021-05542-9
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Stepped-wedge designs (SWD) are increasingly used to evaluate the impact of changes to the process of care within health care systems. However, to generate definitive evidence, a correct sample size calculation is crucial to ensure such studies are properly powered. The seminal work of Hussey and Hughes (Contemp Clin Trials 28(2):182-91, 2004) provides an analytical formula for power calculations with normal outcomes using a linear model and simple random effects. However, minimal development and evaluation have been done for power calculation with non-normal outcomes on their natural scale (e.g., logit, log). For example, binary endpoints are common, and logistic regression is the natural multilevel model for such clustered data. Methods We propose a power calculation formula for SWD with either normal or non-normal outcomes in the context of generalized linear mixed models by adopting the Laplace approximation detailed in Breslow and Clayton (J Am Stat Assoc 88(421):9-25, 1993) to obtain the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters. Results We compare the performance of our proposed method with simulation-based sample size calculation and demonstrate its use on a study of patient-delivered partner therapy for STI treatment and a study that assesses the impact of providing additional benchmark prevalence information in a radiologic imaging report. To facilitate adoption of our methods we also provide a function embedded in the R package "swCRTdesign" for sample size and power calculation for multilevel stepped-wedge designs. Conclusions Our method requires minimal computational power. Therefore, the proposed procedure facilitates rapid dynamic updates of sample size calculations and can be used to explore a wide range of design options or assumptions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    Martin, James
    Taljaard, Monica
    Girling, Alan
    Hemming, Karla
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (02):
  • [22] Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective
    Heo, Moonseong
    Kim, Namhee
    Rinke, Michael L.
    Wylie-Rosett, Judith
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (02) : 480 - 489
  • [23] Sample size calculation for time-to-event data in stepped wedge cluster randomised trials
    Takanashi, Fumihito
    Keding, Ada
    Crouch, Simon
    Kanaan, Mona
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [24] Highly efficient stepped wedge designs for clusters of unequal size
    Matthews, John N. S.
    BIOMETRICS, 2020, 76 (04) : 1167 - 1176
  • [25] A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator
    Hemming, Karla
    Kasza, Jessica
    Hooper, Richard
    Forbes, Andrew
    Taljaard, Monica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (03) : 979 - 995
  • [26] Alternative Designs for Testing Speech, Language, and Hearing Interventions: Cluster-Randomized Trials and Stepped-Wedge Designs
    Patterson, Charity G.
    Leland, Natalie E.
    Mormer, Elaine
    Palmer, Catherine V.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 65 (07): : 2677 - 2690
  • [27] Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes
    Yongdong Ouyang
    Mohammad Ehsanul Karim
    Paul Gustafson
    Thalia S. Field
    Hubert Wong
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [28] Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes
    Ouyang, Yongdong
    Karim, Mohammad Ehsanul
    Gustafson, Paul
    Field, Thalia S.
    Wong, Hubert
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [29] Non-randomized and randomized stepped-wedge designs using an orthogonalized least squares framework
    Hu, Yirui
    Hoover, Donald R.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (04) : 1202 - 1218
  • [30] Sample Size Calculations for Stepped Wedge Designs with Treatment Effects that May Change with the Duration of Time under Intervention
    Hughes, James P.
    Lee, Wen-Yu
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Heagerty, Patrick J.
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2023, 25 (Suppl 3) : 348 - 355