Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective

被引:5
|
作者
Heo, Moonseong [1 ]
Kim, Namhee [2 ]
Rinke, Michael L. [3 ]
Wylie-Rosett, Judith [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, 1300 Morris Pk Ave,Belfer 13th Floor, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Childrens Hosp Montefiore, Dept Pediat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
Stepped-wedge design; three level data; statistical power; sample size; design effect; effect size; CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; PREVENTIVE THERAPY; DESIGN; TUBERCULOSIS;
D O I
10.1177/0962280216632564
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Stepped-wedge (SW) designs have been steadily implemented in a variety of trials. A SW design typically assumes a three-level hierarchical data structure where participants are nested within times or periods which are in turn nested within clusters. Therefore, statistical models for analysis of SW trial data need to consider two correlations, the first and second level correlations. Existing power functions and sample size determination formulas had been derived based on statistical models for two-level data structures. Consequently, the second-level correlation has not been incorporated in conventional power analyses. In this paper, we derived a closed-form explicit power function based on a statistical model for three-level continuous outcome data. The power function is based on a pooled overall estimate of stratified cluster-specific estimates of an intervention effect. The sampling distribution of the pooled estimate is derived by applying a fixed-effect meta-analytic approach. Simulation studies verified that the derived power function is unbiased and can be applicable to varying number of participants per period per cluster. In addition, when data structures are assumed to have two levels, we compare three types of power functions by conducting additional simulation studies under a two-level statistical model. In this case, the power function based on a sampling distribution of a marginal, as opposed to pooled, estimate of the intervention effect performed the best. Extensions of power functions to binary outcomes are also suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 489
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Sample size calculators for planning stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: a review and comparison
    Ouyang, Yongdong
    Li, Fan
    Preisser, John S.
    Taljaard, Monica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (06) : 2000 - 2013
  • [2] Sample size calculations for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with unequal cluster sizes
    Kristunas, Caroline A.
    Smith, Karen L.
    Gray, Laura J.
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [3] Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation procedures for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials
    Grayling, Michael J.
    Mandel, Adrian P.
    Wason, James M. S.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 60 (05) : 903 - 916
  • [4] Sample Size Determination for Three-Level Randomized Clinical Trials with Randomization at the First or Second Level
    Fazzari, Melissa J.
    Kim, Mimi Y.
    Heo, Moonseong
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (03) : 579 - 599
  • [5] Systematic review showed that stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials often did not reach their planned sample size
    Eichner, Felizitas A.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 107 : 89 - 100
  • [6] Systematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    Martin, James
    Taljaard, Monica
    Girling, Alan
    Hemming, Karla
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (02):
  • [7] Sample size calculation for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with more than two levels of clustering
    Teerenstra, Steven
    Taljaard, Monica
    Haenen, Anja
    Huis, Anita
    Atsma, Femke
    Rodwell, Laura
    Hulscher, Marlies
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 16 (03) : 225 - 236
  • [8] Sample size calculation for time-to-event data in stepped wedge cluster randomised trials
    Takanashi, Fumihito
    Keding, Ada
    Crouch, Simon
    Kanaan, Mona
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [9] Sample Size Considerations for GEE Analyses of Three-Level Cluster Randomized Trials
    Teerenstra, Steven
    Lu, Bing
    Preisser, John S.
    van Achterberg, Theo
    Borm, George F.
    BIOMETRICS, 2010, 66 (04) : 1230 - 1237
  • [10] Sample size determinations for group-based randomized clinical trials with different levels of data hierarchy between experimental and control arms
    Heo, Moonseong
    Litwin, Alain H.
    Blackstock, Oni
    Kim, Namhee
    Arnsten, Julia H.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 399 - 413