Two parameter optimization methods of multi-point geostatistics

被引:40
|
作者
Wang, Xixin [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Siyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Shaohua [1 ]
Zhang, Naidan [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, Sch Geosci, Wuhan 430100, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploita, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-point geostatistics; Parameter optimization; Deep learning; Gray level co-occurrence matrix; Reservoir model; CONDITIONAL SIMULATION; POINT STATISTICS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109724
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Multi-point geostatistics has been widely used, but it involves many parameters when applying the method. These modeling parameters are usually sensitive to the quality of the model, such as the template size of the simpat algorithm, the number of nodes in the neighborhood searched of the Snesim algorithm, and the multigrid in common use. What kind of evaluation criteria for selecting the value and ranges of the parameters has become an urgent problem to be solved. Some methods to optimize these modeling parameters have been proposed. These methods either statistics the pattern feature distribution of training image, or use some certain spatial structure as the index to quantitatively evaluate the quality of training image reconstruction of stochastic realizations, or use cross-validation to compare the sample matching degree between the realization and the training image. However, these methods have their limitations in optimizing modeling parameters. In this paper, two methods to optimize the modeling parameters of multi-point geostatistics were proposed based on gray level co-occurrence matrix and convolutional neural network. Both methods can optimize the appropriate parameters by analyzing the influence of the parameters on modeling quality. Taking the frequently used parameters of Snesim and simpat as an example, the parameter optimization results of the GLCM-based method and the Deep Learning-based method are very close, which indicates that both methods can effectively extract and distinguish the spatial features of the model. In addition, the relationship between modeling parameters and evaluation indexes accords with the visual features of stochastic models. Therefore, the method proposed in this paper will be helpful to solve the difficulty of parameter setting in multi-point geostatistical modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-Point Shape Optimization of Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers
    Srinath, D. N.
    Mittal, Sanjay
    Manek, Veera
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2009, 51 (02): : 169 - 189
  • [42] Research on the optimization model for multi-point train formation plan
    Wang, Zhimei
    Lin, Boliang
    Chen, Lei
    Wang, Long
    Wen, Xuhong
    Li, Jian
    Zhongguo Tiedao Kexue/China Railway Science, 2012, 33 (06): : 108 - 114
  • [43] Multi-point design optimization of hydrofoil for marine current turbine
    Xing-qi Luo
    Guo-jun Zhu
    Jian-jun Feng
    Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26 : 807 - 817
  • [44] Multi-point design optimization of hydrofoil for marine current turbine
    罗兴锜
    朱国俊
    冯建军
    JournalofHydrodynamics, 2014, 26 (05) : 807 - 817
  • [45] An agent-based parallel multi-point combinatorial optimization
    Shigehiro, Y
    Masuda, T
    SICE 2003 ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 651 - 656
  • [46] Multi-point sampling
    不详
    GAS ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 1999, 39 (03): : 30 - 30
  • [47] Single and multi-point optimization of an airfoil using gradient method
    Mirzaei, Masoud
    Hosseini, Seyedeh Nasrin
    Roshanian, Jafar
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 79 (06): : 611 - 620
  • [48] Multi-point Layout Optimization of Tracked Vehicle Active Suspension
    Ling Q.
    Chen X.
    Dai J.
    He X.
    Yang S.
    Guo Y.
    Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan/Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 2024, 44 (02): : 397 - 403
  • [49] Multi-point shape optimization of airfoils at low Reynolds numbers
    Srinath, D.N.
    Mittal, Sanjay
    Manek, Veera
    CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 2009, 51 (02): : 169 - 188
  • [50] Wave vector analysis methods using multi-point measurements
    Narita, Y.
    Glassmeier, K. -H.
    Motschmann, U.
    NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 17 (05) : 383 - 394