Two parameter optimization methods of multi-point geostatistics

被引:40
|
作者
Wang, Xixin [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Siyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Shaohua [1 ]
Zhang, Naidan [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, Sch Geosci, Wuhan 430100, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploita, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-point geostatistics; Parameter optimization; Deep learning; Gray level co-occurrence matrix; Reservoir model; CONDITIONAL SIMULATION; POINT STATISTICS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109724
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Multi-point geostatistics has been widely used, but it involves many parameters when applying the method. These modeling parameters are usually sensitive to the quality of the model, such as the template size of the simpat algorithm, the number of nodes in the neighborhood searched of the Snesim algorithm, and the multigrid in common use. What kind of evaluation criteria for selecting the value and ranges of the parameters has become an urgent problem to be solved. Some methods to optimize these modeling parameters have been proposed. These methods either statistics the pattern feature distribution of training image, or use some certain spatial structure as the index to quantitatively evaluate the quality of training image reconstruction of stochastic realizations, or use cross-validation to compare the sample matching degree between the realization and the training image. However, these methods have their limitations in optimizing modeling parameters. In this paper, two methods to optimize the modeling parameters of multi-point geostatistics were proposed based on gray level co-occurrence matrix and convolutional neural network. Both methods can optimize the appropriate parameters by analyzing the influence of the parameters on modeling quality. Taking the frequently used parameters of Snesim and simpat as an example, the parameter optimization results of the GLCM-based method and the Deep Learning-based method are very close, which indicates that both methods can effectively extract and distinguish the spatial features of the model. In addition, the relationship between modeling parameters and evaluation indexes accords with the visual features of stochastic models. Therefore, the method proposed in this paper will be helpful to solve the difficulty of parameter setting in multi-point geostatistical modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local Ranking of Geological Conceptual Models in Non-stationary Settings Using Multi-point Geostatistics
    Selia, Sangga Rima Roman
    Tolosana-Delgado, Raimon
    van den Boogaart, K. Gerald
    MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 54 (05) : 857 - 872
  • [32] Local Ranking of Geological Conceptual Models in Non-stationary Settings Using Multi-point Geostatistics
    Sangga Rima Roman Selia
    Raimon Tolosana-Delgado
    K. Gerald van den Boogaart
    Mathematical Geosciences, 2022, 54 : 857 - 872
  • [33] Multi-point airfoil optimization for axial-flow fan
    DUAN Haojie
    LIU Lei
    DAI Ren
    排灌机械工程学报, 2019, 37 (06) : 469 - 474
  • [34] Multi-Point Optimization of Axial-flow Fan Airfoil
    Liu, Lei
    Hu, Lei
    Guo, Xue-Yan
    Dai, Ren
    Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40 (11): : 2551 - 2558
  • [35] A Multi-point Local Search Algorithm for Continuous Dynamic Optimization
    Yu, Xin
    Wu, Xi
    2016 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2016, : 2736 - 2743
  • [36] Multi-point design optimization of hydrofoil for marine current turbine
    Luo Xing-qi
    Zhu Guo-jun
    Feng Jian-jun
    JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2014, 26 (05) : 807 - 817
  • [37] A multi-point sampling method based on kriging for global optimization
    Xiwen Cai
    Haobo Qiu
    Liang Gao
    Peng Yang
    Xinyu Shao
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 56 : 71 - 88
  • [38] A multi-point sampling method based on kriging for global optimization
    Cai, Xiwen
    Qiu, Haobo
    Gao, Liang
    Yang, Peng
    Shao, Xinyu
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 56 (01) : 71 - 88
  • [39] Optimization of cushion conditions in micro multi-point sheet forming
    Liu, Qiqian
    Lu, Cheng
    Fu, Wenzhi
    Tieu, Kiet
    Li, Mingzhe
    Gong, Xuepeng
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 212 (03) : 672 - 677
  • [40] Weight optimization of skeletal structures with multi-point simulated annealing
    Lamberti, L.
    Pappalettere, C.
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2007, 18 (03): : 183 - 221