Two parameter optimization methods of multi-point geostatistics

被引:40
|
作者
Wang, Xixin [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Siyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Shaohua [1 ]
Zhang, Naidan [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, Sch Geosci, Wuhan 430100, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploita, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-point geostatistics; Parameter optimization; Deep learning; Gray level co-occurrence matrix; Reservoir model; CONDITIONAL SIMULATION; POINT STATISTICS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109724
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Multi-point geostatistics has been widely used, but it involves many parameters when applying the method. These modeling parameters are usually sensitive to the quality of the model, such as the template size of the simpat algorithm, the number of nodes in the neighborhood searched of the Snesim algorithm, and the multigrid in common use. What kind of evaluation criteria for selecting the value and ranges of the parameters has become an urgent problem to be solved. Some methods to optimize these modeling parameters have been proposed. These methods either statistics the pattern feature distribution of training image, or use some certain spatial structure as the index to quantitatively evaluate the quality of training image reconstruction of stochastic realizations, or use cross-validation to compare the sample matching degree between the realization and the training image. However, these methods have their limitations in optimizing modeling parameters. In this paper, two methods to optimize the modeling parameters of multi-point geostatistics were proposed based on gray level co-occurrence matrix and convolutional neural network. Both methods can optimize the appropriate parameters by analyzing the influence of the parameters on modeling quality. Taking the frequently used parameters of Snesim and simpat as an example, the parameter optimization results of the GLCM-based method and the Deep Learning-based method are very close, which indicates that both methods can effectively extract and distinguish the spatial features of the model. In addition, the relationship between modeling parameters and evaluation indexes accords with the visual features of stochastic models. Therefore, the method proposed in this paper will be helpful to solve the difficulty of parameter setting in multi-point geostatistical modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-point geostatistics for ore grade estimation
    Song, Yu-Chen
    Liu, Zhan-Ning
    Meng, Hai-Dong
    Yu, Xiao-Yan
    GEOLOGIA CROATICA, 2019, 72 : 111 - 126
  • [2] Gamification of the Optimization Problem and Multi-point Type Optimization Methods
    Okamoto, Takashi
    Aiyoshi, Eitaro
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2013), 2013, : 3516 - 3522
  • [3] A Calculation Method For Mineral Reserves Based On Multi-point Geostatistics
    Wang, Yongzhi
    Yu, Mengrou
    Wang, Hui
    Wang, Baojuan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 26 (12): : 1809 - 1818
  • [4] Multi-parameter and multi-point measurement
    Hanson, R.K.
    Baer, D.S.
    McMillin, B.K.
    Arroyo, P.
    Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft fuer Physikalische Chemie, 1993, 97 (12):
  • [5] Stochastic inversion of facies and reservoir properties based on multi-point geostatistics
    Liu, Xingye
    Li, Jingye
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Guo, Kangkang
    Li, Chao
    Zhou, Lin
    Cheng, Jiwei
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (06) : 2455 - 2468
  • [6] Multi-point methods for precision measurement
    Kiyono S.
    Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 2010, 76 (02): : 165 - 168
  • [7] Quantitative Prediction of Braided Sandbodies Based on Probability Fusion and Multi-Point Geostatistics
    Kang, Qiangqiang
    Hou, Jiagen
    Liu, Liqin
    Hou, Mingqiu
    Liu, Yuming
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [8] A stochastic inversion method integrating multi-point geostatistics and sequential Gaussian simulation
    Liu XingYe
    Li JingYe
    Chen XiaoHong
    Li Chao
    Guo KangKang
    Zhou Lin
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2018, 61 (07): : 2998 - 3007
  • [9] JOINT OPTIMIZATION OF MULTIPLE MIMO RELAYS FOR MULTI-POINT TO MULTI-POINT COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
    Chalise, Batu K.
    Vandendorpe, L.
    SPAWC: 2009 IEEE 10TH WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL PROCESSING ADVANCES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, : 479 - 483
  • [10] FLATNESS MEASUREMENT BY MULTI-POINT METHODS AND BY SCANNING METHODS
    Lakota, Stanislav
    Goeroeg, Augustin
    AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2011, 1 (01): : 124 - 127