Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children

被引:9
|
作者
Gustafson, Samantha J. [1 ]
Ricketts, Todd A. [2 ]
Picou, Erin M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN; DUAL-TASK PARADIGMS; NONLINEAR FREQUENCY COMPRESSION; DIGITAL NOISE-REDUCTION; NORMAL-HEARING CHILDREN; LISTENING EFFORT; SPEECH RECOGNITION; ACOUSTICAL CONDITIONS; FM; REVERBERATION;
D O I
10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00281
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study sought to evaluate the effects of common hearing aid microphone technologies on speech recognition and listening effort, and to evaluate potential predictive factors related to microphone benefits for school-age children with hearing loss in a realistic listening situation. Method: Children (n = 17, ages 10-17 years) with bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids set to include three programs: omnidirectional, adaptive directional, and omnidirectional + remote microphone. Children completed a dual-task paradigm in a moderately reverberant room. The primary task included monosyllabic word recognition, with target speech presented at 60 dB A from 0 degrees (front) or 180 degrees (back) azimuth. The secondary task was a "go/no-go," visual shape-recognition task. Multitalker babble noise created a +5 dB SNR. Children were evaluated in two speaker conditions (front, back) using all three hearing aid programs. The remote microphone transmitter remained at the front speaker throughout testing. Speech recognition performance was calculated from the primary task while listening effort was measured as response time during the secondary task. Results: Speech presented from the back significantly increased listening effort and caused a reduction in speech perception when directional and remote microphones were used. Considerable variability was found in pattern of benefit across microphones and source location. Clinical measures did not predict benefit patterns with directional or remote microphones; however, child age and performance with omnidirectional microphones did. Conclusions: When compared to a traditional omnidirectional setting, the directional and remote microphone configurations evaluated in this study have the potential to provide benefit for some children and increase difficulty for others when used in dynamic environments. A child's performance with omnidirectional hearing aids could be used to better inform clinical recommendations for these technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 650
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using Propensity Score Matching to Address Clinical Questions: The Impact of Remote Microphone Systems on Language Outcomes in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing
    Curran, Maura
    Walker, Elizabeth A.
    Roush, Patricia
    Sprafford, Meredith
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (03): : 564 - 576
  • [32] The virtual COVID-19 classroom: surveying outcomes, individual differences, and technology use in college students
    Sage, Kara
    Jackson, Sophia
    Fox, Emily
    Mauer, Larissa
    SMART LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [33] The virtual COVID-19 classroom: surveying outcomes, individual differences, and technology use in college students
    Kara Sage
    Sophia Jackson
    Emily Fox
    Larissa Mauer
    Smart Learning Environments, 8
  • [34] Advancing the Translation Between Clinical and Preclinical Models of Individual Differences in Vulnerability in Substance Use Disorders
    Stairs, Dustin J.
    Cyders, Melissa A.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 28 (04) : 377 - 378
  • [35] USE OF PROBE TUBE MICROPHONE MEASUREMENTS IN HEARING-AID SELECTION FOR CHILDREN - SOME INITIAL CLINICAL-EXPERIENCES
    HAWKINS, DB
    MORRISON, TM
    HALLIGAN, PLW
    COOPER, WA
    EAR AND HEARING, 1989, 10 (05): : 281 - 287
  • [36] EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology
    Bamber, J.
    Cosgrove, D.
    Dietrich, C. F.
    Fromageau, J.
    Bojunga, J.
    Calliada, F.
    Cantisani, V.
    Correas, J. -M.
    D'Onofrio, M.
    Drakonaki, E. E.
    Fink, M.
    Friedrich-Rust, M.
    Gilja, O. H.
    Havre, R. F.
    Jenssen, C.
    Klauser, A. S.
    Ohlinger, R.
    Saftoiu, A.
    Schaefer, F.
    Sporea, I.
    Piscaglia, F.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2013, 34 (02): : 169 - 184
  • [37] Challenges in monitoring the development of young children in remote Aboriginal health services: clinical audit findings and recommendations for improving practice
    D'Aprano, A.
    Silburn, S.
    Johnston, V.
    Bailie, R.
    Mensah, F.
    Oberklaid, F.
    Robinson, G.
    RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2016, 16 (03):
  • [39] Association of Remote Technology Use and Other Decentralization Tools With Patient Likelihood to Enroll in Cancer Clinical Trials
    Adams, Devon V.
    Long, Sarah
    Fleury, Mark E.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (07) : E2220053
  • [40] Measures of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Use in Clinical and Research Settings
    Liu, Richard T.
    Bettis, Alexandra H.
    Lawrence, Hannah R.
    Walsh, Rachel F. L.
    Sheehan, Ana E.
    Pollak, Olivia H.
    Stephenson, Auburn R.
    Kautz, Marin M.
    Marlowe, Rachel M.
    ASSESSMENT, 2025, 32 (03) : 303 - 320