Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children

被引:9
|
作者
Gustafson, Samantha J. [1 ]
Ricketts, Todd A. [2 ]
Picou, Erin M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN; DUAL-TASK PARADIGMS; NONLINEAR FREQUENCY COMPRESSION; DIGITAL NOISE-REDUCTION; NORMAL-HEARING CHILDREN; LISTENING EFFORT; SPEECH RECOGNITION; ACOUSTICAL CONDITIONS; FM; REVERBERATION;
D O I
10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00281
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study sought to evaluate the effects of common hearing aid microphone technologies on speech recognition and listening effort, and to evaluate potential predictive factors related to microphone benefits for school-age children with hearing loss in a realistic listening situation. Method: Children (n = 17, ages 10-17 years) with bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids set to include three programs: omnidirectional, adaptive directional, and omnidirectional + remote microphone. Children completed a dual-task paradigm in a moderately reverberant room. The primary task included monosyllabic word recognition, with target speech presented at 60 dB A from 0 degrees (front) or 180 degrees (back) azimuth. The secondary task was a "go/no-go," visual shape-recognition task. Multitalker babble noise created a +5 dB SNR. Children were evaluated in two speaker conditions (front, back) using all three hearing aid programs. The remote microphone transmitter remained at the front speaker throughout testing. Speech recognition performance was calculated from the primary task while listening effort was measured as response time during the secondary task. Results: Speech presented from the back significantly increased listening effort and caused a reduction in speech perception when directional and remote microphones were used. Considerable variability was found in pattern of benefit across microphones and source location. Clinical measures did not predict benefit patterns with directional or remote microphones; however, child age and performance with omnidirectional microphones did. Conclusions: When compared to a traditional omnidirectional setting, the directional and remote microphone configurations evaluated in this study have the potential to provide benefit for some children and increase difficulty for others when used in dynamic environments. A child's performance with omnidirectional hearing aids could be used to better inform clinical recommendations for these technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 650
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] QUITTING - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF FEEDBACK FOR CHILDREN WRITING LOGO PROGRAMS
    CHAMBERS, S
    CLARKE, V
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1988, 23 (01) : 64 - 65
  • [22] Numerical Magnitude Representations and Individual Differences in Children's Arithmetic Strategy Use
    Vanbinst, Kiran
    Ghesquiere, Pol
    De Smedt, Bert
    MIND BRAIN AND EDUCATION, 2012, 6 (03) : 129 - 136
  • [23] Individual differences in nurse and teacher training students' attitudes toward and use of information technology
    Wishart, J
    Ward, R
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2002, 22 (03) : 231 - 240
  • [24] SHORT WAVELENGTH SENSITIVE CONE ACUITY - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND CLINICAL USE
    SWANSON, WH
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1989, 28 (06) : 1151 - 1157
  • [25] Effects of Auditory Training and Remote Microphone Technology on the Behavioral Performance of Children and Young Adults Who Have Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Schafer, Erin C.
    Gopal, Kamakshi V.
    Mathews, Lauren
    Thompson, Skyler
    Kaiser, Kara
    McCullough, Sarah
    Jones, Jessalyn
    Castillo, Priscilla
    Canale, Emilee
    Hutcheson, Avery
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (05) : 431 - 443
  • [26] Remote Microphone System Use in Preschool Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Language Disorder in the Classroom: A Pilot Efficacy Study
    Keller, Mary Alice
    Tharpe, Anne Marie
    Bodfish, James
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2021, 30 (01) : 266 - 278
  • [27] Comparison of Speech Recognition With Adaptive Digital and FM Remote Microphone Hearing Assistance Technology by Listeners Who Use Hearing Aids
    Thibodeau, Linda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2014, 23 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [28] Individual differences in children's reading and spelling strategies and the skills supporting strategy use
    McGeown, Sarah P.
    Medford, Emma
    Moxon, Gerri
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 28 : 75 - 81
  • [29] Developmental and Individual Differences in Young Children's Use and Maintenance of a Selective Memory Strategy
    Schwenck, Christina
    Bjorklund, David F.
    Schneider, Wolfgang
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 45 (04) : 1034 - 1050
  • [30] Comparison of Recommendations and Use of Cardiovascular Risk Equations by Health Technology Assessment Agencies and Clinical Guidelines
    Betts, Marissa Blieden
    Milev, Sandra
    Hoog, Meredith
    Jung, Hyosung
    Milenkovic, Dusan
    Qian, Yi
    Tai, Ming-Hui
    Kutikova, Lucie
    Villa, Guillermo
    Edwards, Christine
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (02) : 210 - 219