Patient-centered research priorities in ovarian cancer: A systematic review of potential determinants of guideline care

被引:19
|
作者
Pozzar, Rachel A. [1 ,2 ]
Berry, Donna L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Phyllis F Cantor Ctr Res Nursing & Patient Care S, 450 Brookline Ave,LW 518, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Ovarian neoplasms; Guideline adherence; Decision making; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; TREATMENT PREFERENCES; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; WOMENS PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION NEEDS; ADHERENCE; QUALITY; EXPERIENCES; DISPARITIES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To (a) determine what is known about the individual and contextual factors that may influence whether a woman with ovarian cancer receives guideline care, and (b) identify patient-centered research priorities in ovarian cancer. Methods. A systematic review of the PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, and Psyclnfo online databases. Eligible articles were published in English, described original research, and either (a) identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline care for ovarian cancer, or (b) described treatment decision making by women with ovarian cancer. Studies were excluded in which women with ovarian cancer did not comprise the entire sample of patient participants. Data were collected in accordance with Garrard's Matrix Method. Study quality was evaluated using the QualSyst tool for evaluating primary research papers. Relevant study findings were imported into NVivo Pro 11 for qualitative synthesis. Results. The search strategy yielded 502 unique citations, of which 78 full-text articles were reviewed. Thirty-three articles met the criteria for inclusion. Study quality was high overall. Factors associated with the receipt of guideline care included race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance type, age, comorbidity, disease stage, tumor characteristics, hospital volume, hospital type, physician volume, and geographic location. Influences on treatment decision making among women with ovarian cancer included the desire to prolong survival, the patient-provider relationship, perceived ability to participate in the treatment decision, values and preferences, information needs, side effects, cost of care, and past experiences with chemotherapy. Conclusions. There is a need for further research that examines ovarian cancer treatment decision making from the perspective of the patient. Priority topics for future research may include the experiences of diverse women receiving treatment for ovarian cancer and the role of shared decision making with providers, referral networks, and practice patterns in the delivery of guideline care. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 722
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] From Comparative Effectiveness Research to Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: Integrating Emergency Care Goals, Methods, and Priorities
    Meisel, Zachary F.
    Carr, Brendan G.
    Conway, Patrick H.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (03) : 309 - 316
  • [32] Making Patient-Centered Cancer Care a Reality
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    Barry, Michael J.
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (24) : 5610 - 5611
  • [33] Priorities for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: The Views of Minority and Underserved Communities
    Goold, Susan Dorr
    Myers, C. Daniel
    Szymecko, Lisa
    Collins, Carla Cunningham
    Martinez, Sal
    Ledon, Charo
    Campbell, Terrance R.
    Danis, Marion
    Cargill, Stephanie Solomon
    Kim, Hyungjin Myra
    Rowe, Zachary
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 52 (02) : 599 - 615
  • [34] A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    Concannon, Thomas W.
    Fuster, Melissa
    Saunders, Tully
    Patel, Kamal
    Wong, John B.
    Leslie, Laurel K.
    Lau, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (12) : 1692 - 1701
  • [35] Identifying Priorities for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research for Serious Mental Illness
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Mansfield, Alyssa J.
    Curtis, Pam
    Gilmore, John H.
    Watson, Lea C.
    Brode, Shannon
    Tyutyulkova, Sonia
    Crotty, Karen
    Viswanathan, Meera
    Tant, Elizabeth
    Gordon, Cathy
    Slaughter-Mason, Samantha
    Shetiman, Brian
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2012, 63 (11) : 1125 - 1130
  • [36] Patient-Centered Diabetes Care of Cancer Patients
    Kotwal, Anupam
    Cheung, Yee-Ming M.
    Cromwell, Grace
    Drincic, Andjela
    Leblebjian, Houry
    Quandt, Zoe
    Rushakoff, Robert J.
    McDonnell, Marie E.
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2021, 21 (12)
  • [37] Patient-Centered Diabetes Care of Cancer Patients
    Anupam Kotwal
    Yee-Ming M. Cheung
    Grace Cromwell
    Andjela Drincic
    Houry Leblebjian
    Zoe Quandt
    Robert J. Rushakoff
    Marie E. McDonnell
    Current Diabetes Reports, 2021, 21
  • [38] Facilitating the delivery of patient-centered cancer care: Insights from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI) cancer portfolio.
    Arora, Neeraj K.
    Gayer, Christopher
    Lawrence, William
    Gershteyn, Vadim
    Dunham, Kelly
    Whitlock, Evelyn
    Clauser, Steven
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [39] Food allergy research priorities: Results from a patient-centered study
    Bilaver, Lucy A.
    Sharma, Hemant P.
    Gupta, Ruchi S.
    Herbert, Linda J.
    Marchisotto, Mary Jane
    Aktas, Ozge N.
    Jiang, Jialing
    Miller, Emily
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2019, 7 (07): : 22431 - +
  • [40] A Systematic Approach to Understanding and Implementing Patient-Centered Care
    Stollenwerk, Diane
    Kennedy, Lauren Birchfield
    Hughes, Lauren S.
    O'Connor, Malachi
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (02) : 173 - 178